期刊文献+

职业经理人会关注他们的市场声誉吗--来自中国资本市场舞弊行为的经验透视 被引量:33

Do Professional Managers Concern Their Market Reputation——An Evidence from Fraud Behaviors in China’s Securities Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文构建了一个经理人声誉与舞弊行为的关系模型,从公司舞弊行为角度透视经理人对自身市场声誉的关注情况。模型预测,基于职业生涯利益的考量,越年轻、合同报酬越高、外部招聘的经理人越注重职业声誉,其所在上市公司越不易发生舞弊。以被证监会处罚的A股上市公司为对象的检验表明:目前我国经理人市场并没有为年轻经理人向市场显示其优秀经营才能和抑制舞弊提供足够激励;外部招聘的经理人并不具备更强经营能力,其所在上市公司舞弊可能性不一定会降低;经理人合同报酬与舞弊显著负相关,但考虑经理人市场竞争后其抑制舞弊的作用降低;经理人市场竞争与经理人合同报酬是两种相互替代的经理人市场治理机制。 This paper develops a game theory model to analyze whether professional managers concern their market reputation based on the perspective of corporate fraud behaviors. The conclusions the model predicts are that, because of career concerns, manager will pay more attention to his/her market reputation when his/her contract pecuniary is higher, he/she is younger or recruited externally, and thus the likelihood of corporate fraud will lower. Using the sample of Chinese A-share listed companies that were punished by CSRC, this paper empirically finds that: ①Managerial labor market can't incentive younger managers to show their high management capacity and prevent fraud; ②The managers recruited from outside of enterprise didn't possess high management capacity, and the probability of fraud in the listed companies those they serve is not lower; ③Though managerial contract pecuniary is significantly negative associate to the probability of fraud, its statistical significance become lower when we consider managerial labor market competition; ④Managerial labor market competition is a manager market governance mechanism substituted of managerial contract pecuniary.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期151-160,共10页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“国有控股公司的资本结构与财权安排研究”(批准号06BJY015)
关键词 经理人市场 声誉 舞弊行为 市场竞争 managerial labor market reputation fraud behaviors market competition.
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Agrawal. A., Sahiba Chadha. Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 2005,48(2).
  • 2Beasley. M. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud[J]. Accounting Review, 1996,71 (4).
  • 3Chalmersa. K., Jayne M. Godfrey. Reputation Costs:The Impetus for Voluntary Derivative [J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2004,(29).
  • 4Chan. W. External Recruitment versus Internal Promotion[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 1996, 14(4).
  • 5Chen. C, S. Chen, X. Su. Profitability Regulation, Earnings Management and Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from China[J]. Auditing,2001,20(2).
  • 6Desai. H, Chris E. Hogan, Michael S Wilkins. The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover[J]. Accounting Review, 2006, 81 (1).
  • 7Fama,E. Agency Problems and Theory of the Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, (2).
  • 8Fich Eliezer M., Anil Shivdasani. Financial Fraud, Director Reputation, and Shareholder Wealth [R]. Working Paper, www.ssrn.com
  • 9Holmstrom,B. Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective [A]. Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck[C]. Swedish School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland, 1982.
  • 10Karpoff Jonathan M., Lott John R Jr. The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1993,36(2).

二级参考文献56

共引文献1375

同被引文献608

引证文献33

二级引证文献477

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部