期刊文献+

榆树黄化病植原体的分子检测与鉴定 被引量:11

Molecular detection and identification of the phytoplasma associated with Elm yellows in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用植原体16S rRNA基因的通用引物R16mF2/R16mR1和R16F2n/R16R2对山东泰山上发生的榆树(Ulmus par-vifolia)黄化病感病植株总DNA进行巢式PCR扩增,得到了约1.2 kb的特异性片段,从分子水平证实了榆树黄化病的病原(EY-China)为植原体。将扩增到的片段测序,并进行一致性和系统进化树分析。结果表明,该分离物属于植原体榆树黄化组(CandidatusPhytoplasma ulmi),与该组成员16S rRNA序列的一致性均在98.2%以上,其中与16SrⅤ-B亚组中的纸桑丛枝(Paper mulberry witches’-broom)和枣疯病(Jujube witches’-broom)植原体一致性最高,达到99.4%,在系统进化树中与该亚组成员聚类到同一个分支,说明该分离物属于植原体16SrⅤ-B亚组。本研究首次对在中国引致榆树黄化病的植原体进行了分子检测,并通过核酸序列分析将其鉴定到亚组水平。 By use of nested-PCR, the 16S rRNA gene of phytoplasma associated with Elm yellows in China (EY-china) was amplified with universal primer pairs R16mF2/R16mRl and R16F2n/R16R2. DNA fragments of ca. 1.2 kb were obtained from the total DNA of diseased elm samples. The fragment was sequenced and subjected to RFLP and phylogenetic analyses. The results indicated that the phytoplasma EY-China was a member of Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi (16SrV), and shared identities of more than 98.2% with other members in this group. It had the highest identity of 99.4%, and formed the same branch in phylogentic tree with phytoplasmas associated with paper mulberry witches' -broom and jujube witches' -broom of subgroup 16SrV-B. These results indicate that EY-China belong to subgroup 16SrV-B. This is the first report of phytoplasma associated with elm yellows disease identified to subgroup level according to molecular evidences in China.
出处 《植物病理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期401-406,共6页 Acta Phytopathologica Sinica
基金 新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-07-0520) “十一五”国家科技支撑计划(2006BAK10B06) 泰安市大学生科技创新计划
关键词 榆树黄化病 植原体 16S RRNA基因 巢式PCR 系统进化分析 Elm yellows phytoplasma 16S rRNA gene nested-PCR phylogenetic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Bai X, Zhang J, Ewing A, et al. Living with genome instability: the adaptation of phytoplasmas to diverse environments of their insect and plant hosts [ J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2006, 188 : 3682 -3696.
  • 2李永,田国忠,朴春根,朱水芳.我国几种植物植原体的快速分子鉴别与鉴定的研究[J].植物病理学报,2005,35(4):293-299. 被引量:34
  • 3Lee I M, Gundersen D E, Bertaccini A. Phytoplasma: ecology and genomic diversity [J]. Phytopathology, 1998, 88 : 1359 - 1366.
  • 4Lee I M, Gundersen-Rindal D E, Davis R E, et al. Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on RFLP analyses of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences [J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1998, 48(4) : 1153 -1169.
  • 5The IRPCM Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma' , a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2004, 54 : 1243 - 1255.
  • 6Seemuller E, Marcone C, Lauer U, et al. Current status of molecular classification of the phytoplasmas [J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 1998, 80:3 -26.
  • 7Lee I M, Martini M, Marcone C, et al. Classification of phytoplasma strains in the elm yellows group (16SrV) and proposal of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi' for the phytoplasma associated with elm yellows [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2004, 54: 337 - 347.
  • 8Arnaud G, Malembic-Maher S, Salar P, et al. Multilocus sequence typing confirms the close genetic interrelatedness of three distinct flavescence doree phytoplasma strain clusters and group 16SrV phytoplasmas infecting grapevine and alder in Europe [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73 ( 12 ) : 4001 - 4010.
  • 9Lanier G N, Schubert D C, Manion P D. Dutch elm disease and elm yellows in central New York: out of the frying phytoplasma [J]. Plant Disease, 1988, 72 : 189 - 194.
  • 10Maurer R, Seemtiller E, Sinclair W A. Genetic relatedness of mycoplasma-like organisms affecting elm, alder, and ash in Europe and North America [J]. Phytopathology, 1993, 83 : 971 -976.

二级参考文献30

  • 1漆艳香,谢艺贤,张辉强,朱水芳,廖晓兰,肖启明.植原体DNA提取方法的改良[J].生物技术通报,2004,20(4):44-46. 被引量:15
  • 2李永,田国忠,朴春根,朱水芳.我国几种植物植原体的快速分子鉴别与鉴定的研究[J].植物病理学报,2005,35(4):293-299. 被引量:34
  • 3方中达.植病研究方法(第三版).北京:中国农业出版社,1998,233-239.
  • 4Henson JM, Coins T, Grey W, et al. Phytopathology, 1993,83(3) :283-285.
  • 5KollarA, Seemuller E, Bonnet F, etal. Phytopathology, 1990,80(3):233-237
  • 6Chen J, Chang CJ, Jarret R, et al. Phytopathology, 1992,82:306-309.
  • 7Lee IM, Hammond RW, David RE, et al. Phytopathology, 1993, 83:834-842.
  • 8Lee I M, Hammond R W, Davis R E, et al. Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasmalike organism[J]. Phytopathology,1993,83 (8) : 834 -842.
  • 9Gundersen D E, Lee I M, Rehner S A. et al. Phylogeny of mycoplasmalike organisms (Phytoplasmas) : a basis for their classification [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1994,176 (19): 5244-5254.
  • 10Subandiyah S T, Toru I, Tsuyumu S J, et al. Comparison of 16S rDNA and 16S/23S intergenic region sequences among citrus greening organisms in Asia [J].Plant Disease, 2000,84(1) : 15 -18.

共引文献48

同被引文献203

引证文献11

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部