期刊文献+

固定支付模式下技术创新的博弈分析

Game Analysis on Technological Innovation under Fixed Payment Pattern
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文构建了企业与科研单位合作技术创新的收益函数和博弈模型,并与企业自主创新的情况对比。研究结果表明,技术创新的技术含量并非越高越好,而是存在最佳产品技术含量;在同等条件下,企业自主技术创新的效益要大于企业与科研单位合作技术创新的效益。因此,一方面,企业不应盲目加大创新投入;另一方面,政府应降低对科研单位的投入,提高企业的研发能力。最后,对模型进行了实例研究。 This paper constructes the income function and the game model based on cooperative technological innovation of enterprises and scientific research units,and contrasts the cooperative technological innovation of enterprises and scientific research units with the independent technological innovation of enterprises. The result shows that, there exists the best technological content of production in technological innovation rather than the technological content of production is the higher the better ; the benefit of technological innovation based on enterprises' independent technological innovation is higher than that based on the cooperative technological innovation of enterprises and scientific research units. Therefore, enterprises should not blindly expand innovation investment, and government should reduce the input for scientific research units and enhance the capability of research and development of enterprises. Finally,a case study is made to verify this model,
出处 《技术经济》 2008年第8期14-17,共4页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"科技生产力形成与流动成本 效益及其优化稳定博弈策略研究"(70473037) 河南省科技厅基金项目:河南省自主创新战略与政策体系研究(0713050308)
关键词 技术创新 博弈 最佳产品技术含量 technological innovation game best technological content of production
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1D' ASPREMONT C, JACQUEMIN A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in a duopoly with spillover[J]. American Economic Review, 1988,78 : 1133-1137.
  • 2KOTARO S. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers[J]. American Economic Review,1992,82(5):1307-1320.
  • 3ZISS S. Strategic R&D with spillover, collusion and welfare [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1994,42 (4) : 375-393.
  • 4姜林.企业技术创新开发的博弈分析[J].科技与管理,2002,4(4):46-48. 被引量:6
  • 5李红艳,熊立,储雪林,席芙蓉.促进技术成果转化长期合作的重复博弈分析[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(1):41-46. 被引量:4
  • 6万君康,梅志敏,彭华涛.企业技术创新模式选择的博弈分析[J].科技管理研究,2003,23(4):39-41. 被引量:34
  • 7徐臻,王理平.技术溢出对创新模式选择的影响[J].上海管理科学,2005,27(1):43-45. 被引量:5
  • 8AGLIARI A,GARDINI L,PUU T. The dynamics of a triopoly cournot game[J]. Chaos,Solitons& Fractals, 2000, 11(15) :2531-2560.
  • 9BISCHI G I, MAMMANA C, GARDINI L. Muhistability and cyclic attractors in duopoly games[J]. Chaos,Solitons & Fractals, 2000,11 (4) : 543-564.
  • 10BISCHI G I, LAMANTIA F. Nonlinear duopoly games with positive cost externalities due to spillover effects [J]. Chaos,Solitons & Fractals,2002,13(4) :701-721.

二级参考文献26

  • 1付家骥.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998..
  • 2[1]Arrow K J. Economic in walfare and the allocation of resource for innovation[A]. In.:Nelson R R(Ed). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity[C]. NJ Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1962:609-626.
  • 3[2]Mansfield, Edwinetal. Imitation Costs and Patents:An Empirical Study[J]. Economic Journal. 1981(4):907-918
  • 4[3]Amit Gars, Christopher Tang. On postponement strategies for production families with multiple points diffrrentiation[J]. IIE Transaction, 1997, 29(8):641-650.
  • 5.九五期间全国科技成果统计分析[EB].http://www.sts.org.cn/tjbg/cgylw/documents/2001/0103.html.,.
  • 6刘学.技术合约与交易费用[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001..
  • 7Chu Xuelin, Xiong Li, Li Hongyan. Standardizing Technology Transfer Network[A]. 6th ITCPI[C]. Japan 2002.8.
  • 8埃弗雷特·M·罗杰斯.创新的扩散[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2002..
  • 9Robert Gibbons,A Primer in Theory,Harvester Wheat—sheaf,1992.
  • 10Roy Garder,Garners for Business and Economics,John Wiley&Sons,Inc.,1995.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部