期刊文献+

应用PPH技术治疗重度痔疮疗效的对照观察 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨痔上黏膜环状切除术(PPH)治疗重度痔疮的疗效。方法107例重度痔疮患者根据手术方式分为PPH组45例和外剥内扎术组62例,比较两组疗效。结果PPH组有效率95.6%,高于外剥内扎术组的80.6%,两组差异有统计学意义(〈0.05)。PPH组手术时间10-18min,平均住院4d,并发症发生率低,均较外剥内扎术组(平均手术时间30-57min,平均住院7d,并发症发生率高)为好,差异有统计学意义(均〈0.01)。结论PPH技术治疗重度痔疮方法便捷、安全、有效。
机构地区 浙江省台州医院
出处 《现代实用医学》 2008年第7期538-539,共2页 Modern Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

  • 1Thomson WHF. The nature of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg,1975, 62: 542-552.
  • 2Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Disease, 2000, 2:170-175.
  • 3Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy ( stapled haemorrhoidectomy ) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized conrolled trial. Lancet, 2000, 335 (9215): 779-781.
  • 4Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L, et al. Early and late(Ten Years) Experience with Circular Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum.2001,44(6) :836.
  • 5Sutheland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy[ J ]. Arch Surg 2002,137 ( 12 ): 1395.
  • 6Khalil KH, O'Bichere A, Sellu D. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy[J]. Br J Surg,2000,87(10):1352.
  • 7Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropueumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids:report of a case and subsequent considerations[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45(2) :268.
  • 8吴阶平 裘法祖主编.黄家驷外科学第5版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.437-438.
  • 9姚礼庆 唐竞 戈少云 等.经吻合器治疗重度痔疮[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,38(4):342-342.
  • 10Gabrielli F, Chiarelli M, Cioffi U, et al. Day surgery for mucosalhemomrrhoidal prolspse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia. Dis Colon Recturn,2001,44:842-844.

共引文献539

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部