期刊文献+

具有保留效用的一般网络价格竞争博弈的寡占均衡 被引量:1

Oligopoly Equilibrium Price of Price Competition Game with Reserved Utility in General Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文讨论了具有保留效用的一般网络的多个服务提供商之间的价格竞争博弈问题。给出了用户均衡的定义,并证明了其存在性、唯一性和连续性。由服务提供商所给价格和对应价格的用户均衡,给出了寡占均衡和严格寡占均衡的定义。根据Wardrop原理,给出了给定价格下用户均衡流量分配的特征刻画。本文还讨论了寡占均衡和严格寡占均衡的性质,给出严格寡占均衡价格的特征刻画,并用并行链路网络例证了文章的主要结果。 This paper discusses the price competition game among multiple service providers in a general network with reserved utility. We give the definition of user equilibrium, show its existence, uniqueness and continuity with respect to price, and then define the oligopoly equilibrium as the equilibrium prices set by the service provider and the corresponding user equilibrium. For a given price, we provide a characterization of the user equilibrium of flow rates under the Wardrop assumption. Furthermore, we discuss some properties of the oligopoly equilibrium and strict oligopoly equilibrium and explicitly characterize the oligopoly equilibrium price. We also illustrate our main result with parallel link network.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期198-201,共4页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(Nos.60473094) 上海市科技研究基金(Nos.05JC14063) 上海市登山行动重点基础研究项目(Nos.06JC14065)
关键词 价格竞争博弈 均衡 寡占 保留效用 均衡价格 Price competition game,Equilibrium,Oligopoly,Reserved utility,Equilibrium price
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game Theory [M]. The MIT Press, 1991.
  • 2Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A. Flow control, routing, and performance from service provider viewpoint [R]. LIDS report. WP- 1696. September 2004.
  • 3Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A. Competition and efficiency in congested markets [J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2007,32 (1):1-31.
  • 4Ozdaglar A. Price Competition with Elastic Traffic. Networks, 2006.
  • 5Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A. Competition in Parallel-serial Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2007, 26(6) : 1180-1192.
  • 6Correa J R,Schulz A S, et al. Selfish Routing in Capacitated Networks[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2004, 29 (4) : 961-976.
  • 7Hayrapetyan A, Tardos E, Wexler T. A network pricing game for selfish traffic [J]. Journal Distributed Computing, 2007,19: 255-266.
  • 8Roughgarden T, Tardos E. How bad is selfish routing [J]. Jour nal of the ACM,2002,49(2) :236-259.
  • 9Shenker S. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet [J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1995, 13(7) : 1176-1188.
  • 10Berge C. Topological spaces [ M]. Dover Press, 1997.

同被引文献10

  • 1Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game theory[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991.
  • 2Bertrand J. Th~orie Math~matique de la richesse sociale[J]. Journal des Savants, 1883,9:499.
  • 3YUE Xiaohang, Mukhopadhyay S K, ZHU Xiaowei. A Bertrand model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006,59:1182.
  • 4Wambach A. Bertrand competition under cost uncertainty[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1999,17: 941.
  • 5Doganoglu T. Dynamic price competition with consumption externalities[J].Netnomics, 2003,5: 43.
  • 6Requate T. Repeated price competition with increasing marginal costs[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1994, 23:1.
  • 7Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A. Flow control, routing, and performance from service provider viewpointER]. Cambridge: M I T. Dept of Economics,2004.
  • 8Huang Xin,Ozdaglar A E, Acemoglu D. Efficiency and Braess'paradox under pricing in general networks[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2006,24 (5) : 977.
  • 9Shenker S. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet [J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1995, 13(7) : 1176.
  • 10OzdaglarA. Price competition with elastic traffic[J].Networks, 2008,52 (3) : 141.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部