期刊文献+

现实主义国际法观的转变:对共生现实主义的一种解读 被引量:5

A Shift in Realism View upon International Law:Comprehending Symbiotic Realism
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为两个有着密切关系的学科,国际关系与国际法在二者发展过程中却渐行渐远,这是由国际关系现实主义理论兴起并占据主导地位的历史原因造成的。现实主义的"利益"、"权力"观与国际法的"权威"、"服从"理念无法调和,导致国际法受到冷落和排斥。但近年现实主义的全新发展形式"共生现实主义"的出现,开启了现实主义包容国际法的大门,其所主张的"双重本体论"、"多元化的行为体及治理结构"以及以共生关系为基础的"国家偏好"取向,是对国际法的全面接纳,体现了现实主义国际法观的重大转变,为国际关系理论与国际法的全面互动带来了新的曙光。 Despite the close interrelationship in between,the two disciplines of International Relations and International law are going to have more differences.This is mainly because of the rise and leading role of realism theory in International Relations.Realism's understandings to 'Profit' and 'Power' diverge greatly from views of 'Authority' and 'Obedience' in International Law,thus resulting in the spurn and repulsion of International Law.However,Realism has recently developed a new view of 'Symbiotic Realism',which makes International Law comparably been accepted.This new view protests ideas of 'Dual Ontology','Multi-actors and Governance Structure' and a symbiotic-relation-based 'Nation Preference'.All these ideas reveal that International Law is fully accepted and there is a shift in realism view upon International Law.This signs a good beginning of an all-round interaction between International Relations theory and International Law.
作者 唐小松
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第8期69-74,共6页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Quincy Whight, The Study of International Relations, New York: Appleton - Century - Crofts, Inc. , 1955, p. vii.
  • 2刘志云.试论当代国际关系理论中的国际法角色定位[J].现代国际关系,2003(2):30-35. 被引量:9
  • 3刘志云.国际机制理论与国际法的发展[J].现代国际关系,2004(10):36-41. 被引量:10
  • 4刘志云.论现代国际关系理论与国际法研究的三次联结及其影响[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2006,24(2):17-24. 被引量:9
  • 5Quincy Whight, The Study of international Relations ,p. 26.
  • 6Anne - Marie Slaughter, Adrew S. Tulumello and Stepan Wood, “International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, No. 3, 1998, p. 379.
  • 7Edward H. Can', ed. ,The Twenty-Year's Crisis,London: Macmillan, 1946, pp. 228 -229.
  • 8Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf, 1973, p. 227, p. 291.
  • 9Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, p. 291.
  • 10George Kennan, American Diplomacy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984, p. 95.

二级参考文献115

  • 1[美]亚历山大·温特.国际政治的社会理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000..
  • 2[美]亚历山大·温特著 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年.198-229,281-290.
  • 3刘杰著.《经济全球化时代的国际机制的秩序重构》[Z].,.第93页.
  • 4陈玉刚 陈志敏.“构建主义:新现实主义和新自由主义之后”[A].任晓编.《国际关系理论新视野》[C].长征出版社,2001年版.第259页.
  • 5罗伯特·基欧汉编 郭树勇译.《新现实主义及其批判》译序[M].北京大学出版社,2002年版.第21页.
  • 6王杰主编.《国际机制论》[M].新华出版社,2001年版.第76-92页.
  • 7刘杰著.《经济全球化时代的国际机制的秩序重构》[M].高等教育出版社、上海社会科学院出版社,1999年版.第92页.
  • 8Joel R Paul, " Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Economic Law: The New Movements in International Economic Law", The Ameriam University Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol.10, No.4,1995, p.212.
  • 9Kenneth W Abbott, Robert O Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne- Marie Slaughter and Duncan Snidal, "The Concept of Legalization", International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3. Summer 2000. p.416.
  • 10Joel R Paul, " Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Economic Law: The New Movements in International Economic Law", The Ameriam University Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol.10, No.4,1995, p.212.

共引文献42

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部