摘要
This paper explains,clarifies and argues for the following thesis:the revisablility of logic is a serious and difficult topic,it means that classic logic is revisable,but the revision is local and partial,not total and comprehensive.Classic logic cannot justify itself completely,besides metalogical justification,some other forms of justification are needed.Logic is the abstraction and idealization of human epistemic practice,and also has some indirect and remote connections with the world,that is why logic is revisable.There is no essential difference between the methodology of logic and the methodology of other sciences,that is,they both adopt the procedure of hypothesis-deduction.It is difficult for people to accept the revisability of logic just because they make some inappropriate reasonings and transitions.Although logic is revisable,it is always a reasonable strategy not to hurt logic.Revisionism in logic is almost fallibilism in logic,vice versa.
This paper explains,clarifies and argues for the following thesis:the revisablility of logic is a serious and difficult topic,it means that classic logic is revisable,but the revision is local and partial,not total and comprehensive.Classic logic cannot justify itself completely,besides metalogical justification,some other forms of justification are needed.Logic is the abstraction and idealization of human epistemic practice,and also has some indirect and remote connections with the world,that is why logic is revisable.There is no essential difference between the methodology of logic and the methodology of other sciences,that is,they both adopt the procedure of hypothesis-deduction.It is difficult for people to accept the revisability of logic just because they make some inappropriate reasonings and transitions.Although logic is revisable,it is always a reasonable strategy not to hurt logic.Revisionism in logic is almost fallibilism in logic,vice versa.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第8期108-117,共10页
Philosophical Research
