期刊文献+

主成分权重法在番茄果实商品性综合评价上的应用探讨 被引量:23

Discussion on Comprehensive Evaluation of Commercial Traits of Tomato Fruits Using the Method of Weighting of Principal Component
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验以主成分权重法对7个番茄品系的果实商品性状进行了综合评价分析,构建了综合评价函数。结果表明:应用主成分法提取了2个主成分,累计方差贡献率达86.59%,变量的权重偏重于营养品质和外观品质,合乎评价的要求。将7个品系的商品性分为3个层次,品系间在营养品质和耐贮品质的得分上分化较大,外观品质上分化较小,利于品系评选。第1层次是02-6和YH02-9,第2层次是02-1和YH02-7,第3层次02-11、02-8和02-5。此方法把AHP法和主成分法结合起来,考虑了变量测度的转换,使评价客观、分数直观、层次分明,对番茄果实商品性的综合评价有较好的适用性。 Commercial traits of 7 tomato cultivars were comprehensively evaluated using the method of weighting of principal component in the experiment. The comprehensive evaluation function was built up. The results showed that with the factor analyzed, 2 principal components were abstracted and their cumulative rate of variance was 86.59%. The weights of the nourishment quality and the external appearance quality were higher, which was met up to the demand of the comprehensive evaluation. According to the scores of commercial traits, the euhivars varied considerably in the nourishment quality traits and the preservative quality traits, and less in the external appearance quality traits. This was helpful to pick out good one. The eultivars were divided into three classes, of which 'YH02-6' and 'YH02-9' were in the first class, 'YH02-1' and 'YH02-7' were in the second class, and 'YH02-11', 'YH02-8' and 'YH02-5' were in the lowest class. This approved that this analysis method was a practical and efficient way to analyze the commercial traits of the fruits of tomato comprehensively. It integrated the methods of AHP and the principal component analysis to make the evaluating lob easy, objective, and obvious.
机构地区 云南农业大学
出处 《吉林农业科学》 CSCD 2008年第4期49-52,共4页 Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences
基金 云南省自然科学基金项目(2001-C0035M)
关键词 AHP 主成分分析 测度转换 综合评价 AHP Principal component analysis Transforming of variable The comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1胡中锋,莫雷.论因素分析方法的整合[J].心理科学,2002,25(4):474-475. 被引量:25
  • 2刘坚,苏军.因子分析在综合素质评价中的应用[J].华东交通大学学报,2004,21(5):145-149. 被引量:19
  • 3刘坚,朱红岩,柳春.大学生综合素质评价指标体系及其数据采集的研究[J].山东教育学院学报,2005,20(2):9-12. 被引量:28
  • 4Daniel W. Russell. In Search of" Underlying Dimensions; The Use(and Abuse) of Factor Analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002,28 ( 12 ) :1629 - 1646.
  • 5MacCallum, R. C. , Widaman, K. F. , Zhang, S. , Hong, S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psycholical - 1 Methods, 1999,4 : 84 - 99.
  • 6Comrey,A. L. , &Lee, H. B. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. , Hillsdale,NJ : Lawrence Erlbum, 1992.
  • 7Gorsuch, R. L. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. , Hillsdate, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983 .
  • 8Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C.,&Strahan, E. J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods,1999,4:272 - 299.
  • 9Gorsuch, R. L. Exploratory factor analysis. In J. R.Nesselroade&R. B. Cattell ( Eds. ), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. 2nd ed. ,. New York: Plenum,1983:231 -258.
  • 10侯杰泰 成子娟.验证性因子分析:问卷题数及小样本应用策略[J].心理学报,1999,31(1):76-76.

共引文献194

同被引文献371

引证文献23

二级引证文献276

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部