期刊文献+

靶控输注瑞芬太尼在小儿非肌松药气管插管中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Remifentanil by TCI without relaxant for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同血浆浓度的瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚时,在小儿不使用肌松药所提供的气管插管条件和心血管反应。方法45例择期手术患儿,随机分为3组,血浆浓度分别为Ⅰ组2ng/mL,Ⅱ组为3ng/mL,Ⅲ组为4ng/mL。靶控输注瑞芬太尼5min后,开始靶控输注丙泊酚(2.5μg/mL),10min后进行气管插管,失败后则增加瑞芬太尼靶控浓度1ng/mL,10min后重复,再次失败则退出本研究。在瑞芬太尼输注前,丙泊酚开始输注时置入喉镜前以及插管后1min,分别记录气管插管评分、平均动脉压和心率,同时记录不良反应和血管活性药物的使用。结果第1次插管评分,2ng/mL组、3ng/mL组及4ng/mL组分别为(9.5±2.3)、(7.1±2.4)和(5.6±1.1)分;第1次插管成功率分别为9/15(60%)、11/15(73%)和(13/15)87%;第2次插管成功率分别为3/6(50%)、3/4(75%)和2/2(100%)。各组心率均有下降,以3ng/mL和4ng/mL组尤其明显;动脉压显著下降则见于4ng/mL组。2ng/mL组患儿插管后较插管前相比心率与血压明显升高。高浓度瑞芬太尼组需用血管活性药物比例增加。结论小儿固定丙泊酚TCI血浆浓度2.5μg/mL,不使用肌松药时,瑞芬太尼3、4ng/mL血浆浓度可基本满足插管条件。随瑞芬太尼TCI浓度增加,插管成功率提高,但同时心率减慢发生率也明显上升。 [Objective] To observe the tracheal intubation conditions hemodynamic changes during Remifentanil target controlled infusion(TCI) at different plasma concentrations combined with Propofol. [Methods] Forty-five pediatric patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Remlfentanil were given using TCI at plasma concentration of 2 ng/mL, 3 ng/mL and 4 ng/mL in each group respectively and after 5-min Remifentanil infusion, Propofol was given with TCI at plasma concentration 2.5 μg/mL. Ten minutes later, inserting laryngoscope and tracheal intubation were teied and intubation conditions were recorded. If failed, the Remifentanil concentration was tried ten minutes later. The heart rate and blood pressure at baseline, after Remifentanil infusion, before intubation and one minute after intubation were recorded.Meanwhile, the intubation scores and side effects during induction were recorded.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第15期2242-2244,共3页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 小儿 瑞芬太尼 丙泊酚 气管插管 small children Remifentanil Propofol tracheal intubation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1杨东林,何小京,吕志平.小儿丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉的体会[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(17):2713-2713. 被引量:27
  • 2马汉祥,马富强,刘红.瑞芬太尼的研究进展[J].宁夏医学杂志,2006,28(2):158-159. 被引量:6
  • 3BOUILLON T,BRUHN J,RADU RADULESCU L,et al.A model of ventilatory depressant potency of rentifentanil in a nonsteady stste[J].Anesthesiology,2003,99(10):779-787.
  • 4LEDOWSKI T.BEIN B,HANSS R,et al.Neuroendocrine stress response and heart rate variability:a comparison of total intravenous versus balanced anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,2005,101(6):1700-1705.
  • 5MINTO CF,SEHNIDER TW,EGAN TD,et al.Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil:Ⅰ model development[J].Anesthesiology,1997,86(12):10-23.
  • 6CUCCHIARO MD,SCOTT D,MARKOWITZ MD,et al.Blood glucose control during selective arterial stimulation and venous sampling for localization of focal hyperinsulinism lesions in anesthetized children[J].Anesth Analg,2004,99(4):1044-1048.
  • 7SHENG YY,XU ZB.Pharmacokinetics and clinic application of remifentanil[J].Chin J New Drags Clin Rem,2001,20(2):142-146.
  • 8JESHI GP,WARNER DS,TWERSKY RS,et al.A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multieenter phase Ⅳ study[J].J Clin Anesth,2002,14(7):494-499.
  • 9穆娅玲,王刚,刘培中,张宏.盐酸艾司洛尔预防全麻气管插管心血管反应的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2004,14(6):60-62. 被引量:10

共引文献1

同被引文献17

  • 1汤如荣,裴凌,王俊科.全麻诱导气管插管期间病人听觉诱发电位指数及心血管反应的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(4):252-254. 被引量:21
  • 2CHALUMEAU-LEMOINE L, STOCLIN A, BILLARD V, et al. Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and remifentanil target-controlled infusion in ICU: a preliminary study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(1): 53-58.
  • 3HABERTH:R C, LEHMANN F, RITZ R. Assessment of depth of midazolam sedation using objective parameters [J]. Intensive Care Med, 1996, 22(12): 1385-1390.
  • 4JENSEN MP, KAROLY P, BRAVER S. The measuremenl of clinical pain intensity, a comparison of six methods[J]. Pain, 1986, 27(1): 117-126.
  • 5FABBRI LP, NUCERA M, MARSILI M, et al. Ketamine, propo- fol and low dose remifentanil versus propofol and remifentanil for ERCP outside the operating room: is ketamine not only a "rescue drug"[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2012, 18(9): 575-580.
  • 6MOERMAN AT, HERREGODS LL, DE VOS MM, et al. Manual versus target-controlLed infusion remifentanil administration in spontaneously breathing patients[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108(3): 828-834.
  • 7MURDOCH JA, HYDE RA, KENNY GN. Target-controlled remifentanil in combination with propofol for spontaneously breathing day-ease patients[J]. Anaesthesia, 1999, 54(11): 1028- 1031.
  • 8GOLD MI, WATKINS WD, SUNG YF, et al. Remifentanil versus remifentani:/ midazolam for ambulatory surgery during monitored anesthesia care[J]. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87(1): 51-57.
  • 9BANG YS, PARK C, LEE SY, et al. Comparison between moni- tored anesthesia care with remifentani| under ilioinguina| hy- pogastrie nerve block and spinal anesthesia for herniorrhaphy[J].Korean J Anesthesiol, 2013, 64(5): 414-419.
  • 10HU R, LIU JX, JIANG H. Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a dou- ble-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. J Anesth, 2013, 27 (2): 211-217.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部