期刊文献+

风险情境中血缘关系对风险决策的影响 被引量:4

The role of kin on risky decision making
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨风险情境中的血缘关系对风险决策的影响。方法采用生死问题决策问卷,以整群抽样的方式,抽取683名大学生,将其随机分成15组。结果正、负框架之间出现框架效应的是2-4组(χ^2=10.83)、3—3组(χ^2=20.78)和6-0组(χ^2=7.47),3组均在负面框架下风险选择人数最多,分别为37(78.7%)、40(93.0%)和37(82.2%),差异具有显著性(P〈0.01);与基线水平比较发现,仅在正面框架与基线水平间出现效应的是2-4组(χ^2=5.39)和6-0组(χ^2=5.83),差异具有显著性(P〈0.05);正面、负面均与基线水平间出现框架效应的是3-3组(χ^2=4.09;7.91),正面、负面与平衡框架下风险选择人数分别为23(48.9%)、40(93.0%)和32(69.6%),差异具有显著性(P〈0.05)。此外,女性框架效应发生在2-4组(χ^2=13.09)、3-3组(χ^2=18.09)和6-0组(χ^2=6.189),均差异有显著性(P〈0.05);男性仅在3-3组出现框架效应(χ^2=13.09,P〈0.01)。结论血缘关系是影响决策的重要因素,风险情境中不同的人员构成会导致不同的风险偏好。 Objective To study the effects of kin on risky decision-making. Methods By means of cluster sampling,683 undergraduates from a university were investigated with life-death problem. The participants were assigned to one of the fifteen groups. Result Framing effects between positive and negative frame occurred in 2-4 ( χ^2 = 10. 83 ) ,3-3 (χ^2 = 20.78) and 6-0 (χ^2 = 7.47 ) group contexts. Under negative frame,the number of people who selected risky option was 37 (78.7 % ) ,40 (93.0%) and 37 (82.2%) , respectively. Significant difference was all found ( P〈0.01 ). Compared with the baseline level of risk preference,framing effects between positive and balanced frame only occurred in 2-4 (χ^2 = 5.39 ) and 6-0 (χ^2 = 5.83 ) group contexts, Framing effects all occurred between positive or negative and balanced frame in 3-3 group contexts (χ^2 =4.09; 7.91 ). Under positive, negative and balanced frames, the number of people who selected risky option were 23 (48.9%) ,40(93.0% ) and 32(69.6% ), respectively. The results showed significant difference (P 〈 0. 05 ), Additionally, the results showed that women exhibited framing effects on 2-4 (χ^2 = 13.09) ,3-3 (χ^2 = 18.09 )and 6-0 (χ^2 = 6. 185 )groups. Significant difference aIl occurred(P 〈0.05) ; men only exhibited framing effect on 3-3 (χ^2= 13.09, P 〈 0.01 ) group context. Conclusion The kin had an important effect on risk preference. The different risky preference occurred in different group context.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第8期740-741,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 横断面研究 决策 框架效应 血缘关系 Cross-sectional study Decision-making Framing effect Kin
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Druckman JN. Evaluating framing effects. Journal of Economic Psychology,2001,22:91-101.
  • 2张银玲,苗丹民,孙云峰.框架效应对军校大学生决策判断的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(2):155-156. 被引量:11
  • 3张银玲,苗丹民.不同信息框架对大学生决策行为的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(11):1019-1020. 被引量:5
  • 4Wang XT,Simons F,Bredart S. Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2001,14 : 1-15.
  • 5Tversky A, Kahneman D. The faming of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981,211:453-458.
  • 6Fagley NS, Miller PM. Framing effects and arenas of choice : your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997,71:355-373.

二级参考文献15

  • 1何贵兵,梁社红,刘剑.风险偏好预测中的性别差异和框架效应[J].应用心理学,2002,8(4):19-23. 被引量:49
  • 2庄锦英.情绪、边框影响决策认知过程的实验研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1340-1343. 被引量:20
  • 3孙悦,李纾.澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):260-267. 被引量:20
  • 4张银玲,苗丹民,孙云峰.框架效应对军校大学生决策判断的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(2):155-156. 被引量:11
  • 5Tversky A,Kahneman D.The faming of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,1981,211:453-458.
  • 6Shiv B,Edell JA,Payne JW.Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages.Journal of Consumer Research,1997,24:285-294.
  • 7Lauriola M,Russob PM,Lucidib F,et al.The role of personality in positively and negatively famed risky health decisions.Personality and individual differences,2005,38:45-59.
  • 8Fagley NS,Miller PM.Framing effects and arenas of choice:your money or your life?.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1997,71:355-373.
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981,211:453-458.
  • 10Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes,1998,76:149-188.

共引文献13

同被引文献36

  • 1张银玲,苗丹民,罗正学,刘旭峰,齐建林.正负信息框架下人格特征对决策的影响作用[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(4):363-366. 被引量:23
  • 2张凤华,邱江,邱桂凤,张庆林.决策中的框架效应再探[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):886-890. 被引量:34
  • 3Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981,211:453-457.
  • 4Pochon JB, Riis J. Functional imaging of decision conflict. J Neuros-ei ,2008,28:3468-3473.
  • 5Khberger A. The influence of framing on risk decisions : A meta analy- sis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,1998,75:23-55.
  • 6Gonzalez C, Dana J, Koshino H, et al. The framing effect and risky de- cisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI. J Eco Psychol, 2005,26 : 1-20.
  • 7Kuo FY, Hsu CW, Day RF. An exploratory study of cognitive effort in- volved in decision under Framing: an application of the eye-trackingtechnology. Decis Supp Syst,2009 ,48 :81-91.
  • 8Levin IP, Gaeth GJ, Schreiber J. A new look at framing effects : Distri- bution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,2002,88:411-429.
  • 9Parker AM, Ficchhoff B. Decision-making competence : external vali- dation through an individual-differences approach. J Behav Decis Making,2005,18 : 1-27.
  • 10Tversky A,Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[ J]. Science,1981,211:453 - 458.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部