7Volker Behr, Punitive Damages in American and German law- Tendencies Towards Approximation of Apparently Irreconcilable Concepts, Chicago-Kent law Review, Vol,78, pp, 105- 161.
9Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, David schkade, Assessing Punitive Damages (With Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law), Yale Law Journal, Vol, 107, No.7, pp,207 - 253.
10A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven ShaveU, Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 111, No.4, pp. 869-962.
二级参考文献102
1《牛津法律大辞典》.光明日报出版社1998年版.
2Wils. K.B. 205, 95 Eng. R.ep. 768 (C.P. 1763).
3Genay v. Norris ,1 S.C.L. 3,1 Bay6 (1784).
4Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal. App. 3d 757, 174 Cat. Rptr. 348 (1981).
5Malzof v. Uited States, 112 S.Ct.711,715(1992).
6Michael Rustad & Thomas Koenig, The Supreme Court and Junk Social Science : Selective Distortion in Amicus Briefs , 72 N.C.L. Rev. 91 (1993).
7Stephen Daniels & Joanne Martin, Myth a' nd Reality in Punitive Damages, 75 Minn. L. Rev. 1, 31 (1990).
8Richard L. Abel,The Real Tort Crisis - Too Few Claims,48 Ohio St. L.J. 443, 459 (1987).
9Thomas A. Eaton & Susette M.Talarico,A Profile of Tort Litigation in Georgia and Reflections on Tort Reform,30 Ga.L.Rev. 627,667 (1996).
10Mark A. Hoffman, Punitive Awards common in Financial Cases, Bus. Ins., June 23, 1997, at 36.
