期刊文献+

优生与差生成败归因、成就动机差异研究 被引量:2

A Comparison on the Attribution of Success or Failure,Achievement Motivation between High-achieved and Low-achieved Students.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨优、差生的成败归因和成就动机差异。方法采用归因和动机量表对初中优、差生进行调查。结果①成功情境,优、差生能力(F=4.64,P<0.05)和教学质量(F=12.37,P<0.01)归因城乡差异显著;②失败情境,优、差生教学质量归因城乡差异显著(F=10.87,P<0.01);③优、差生避免失败动机城乡差异显著(F=8.29,P<0.01)。结论优、差生成败归因与成就动机差异显著。 Objective To examine differences of attribution and motivation between the high-achieved and the low-achieved. Methods The subjects were administrated with the Attribution Scale and the Achievement Motivation Scale. Results (1)When successed, significant interactions were found under ability (F= 4.64, P〈 0.05) and teaching (F = 12.37, P〈 0.01 ) attribution. (2)When failed, significant interaction was found under teaching(F= 10.87, P〈0.01)attribution. (3)Significant interactions were found under avoiding-failure motivation (F= 8. 29, P〈0.01). Conclusion There were obviously differences of attribution and achievement motivation between the high-achieved and the low-achieved.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2008年第9期998-999,共2页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 成败归因 成就动机 优生 差生 Attribution Achievement motivation low-achieved students High-achieved students
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1何先友.小学生数学自我效能、自我概念与数学成绩关系的研究[J].心理发展与教育,1998,14(1):45-48. 被引量:53
  • 2韩仁生.中小学生考试成败归因的研究[J].心理学报,1996,28(2):140-147. 被引量:70
  • 3杨心德,徐钟庚,陈朝阳.初中生的自我有效感及其对学习目标的影响[J].心理发展与教育,1993,9(3):11-17. 被引量:51
  • 4Martinez R, Sewell K W. Explanatory style as a predictor of college performance in students with physical disabilities.Journal of Rehabilitation,2000, 66( 1 ) :30 - 36.
  • 5Nathawat S S, Singh R, Singh B. The effect of need for achievement on attributional style. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1997,137 : 55 - 62.
  • 6Yasutake D, Bryan T H, Dohrn E. The effects of combining peer tutoring and attribution training on students' perceived self- competence. Remedial and Special Education, 1996,17:83-91.
  • 7Cares D S, Shontz F C, Fowler S A. The effects of time pressure on social cognitive problem - solving by aggressive and nonaggressive boys. Child Study Journal, 1996,26 ( 3 ) :163 - 91.
  • 8Collen S C, Beth A H, Lori M H, Gerald I M. The children's attributional style interview: Developmental test of cognitive diathesis - stress theories of depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,2001,29(5) :445-463.
  • 9Tabassam, Waheeda, Grainger J ( 2002 ), Self - concept,attributional style and self - efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2002,25(2):141 - 151.
  • 10Martinez R, Sewell K W. Explanatory style as a predictor of college performance in students with physical disabilities.Journal of Rehabilitation,2000, 66( 1 ) :30 - 36.

共引文献312

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部