期刊文献+

独立董事功能与角色定位新议

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文依据利益相关者理论,以利益相关者通过提供要素使用权合作投资组成企业这一合约过程中发生的利益冲突与协调为主线,提出了"利益协调论",对独立董事的本原性质和治理效应弱化的根本原因进行了重新解读,并基于"利益协调论"的基本逻辑,对独立董事的功能定位、职责细化、激励约束等方面重新架构,以期真正发挥独立董事治理硬约束的作用。
出处 《工业技术经济》 北大核心 2008年第8期149-153,共5页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Blragat, S., and B.Black. The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance [ J ]. Business Lawyer, 1999, (54) : 921 -963.
  • 2Mehran, H. Executive Compensation Structure Ownership, and Firm Perfomance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, (38): 163-184.
  • 3Agrawal, A., And C.R.Knoeber. Fima Performance arid Mechanisms to Control Agency Problenrs between Managers and Shareholders [J].The Journal of FinatLcial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996, (31): 377-397.
  • 4Yermack, D. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, (40): 185-211.
  • 5Bhagat, S., and B. Black. The Noel- Correlation between Board Independence and Long- Term Firm Performance [J]. The Journal of Corporation Law, 2002, (27): 231 - 273.
  • 6Bebchuk, L.A., J.M. Fried, and D.I.Walker. Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation [J]. Universlu of Chicago Law Review, 2002, 69 (3) : 751 - 846.
  • 7Core, J.E., R.W. Holthausen, and D.F. Larcker. TCorporate Governance, Chief Executive Ofi%er Compensation and Firm Performance [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, (51): 371-406.
  • 8Coughlan, A. T. , and R. M. Schmidt. Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Finn Performance: An Empirical Investigation [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985, 7:43-66.
  • 9谢德仁.独立董事是装饰品吗:从报酬委员会和审计委员会来看[J].审计研究,2004(6):26-29. 被引量:25
  • 10谢德仁.独立董事:代理问题之一部分[J].会计研究,2005(2):39-45. 被引量:114

二级参考文献53

  • 1Mak, Y. T. , and Y. Li. 2001. Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure: Evidence from Singapore, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (3) : 235 - 256.
  • 2Mehran, H.. 1995. Executive Compensation Structure Ownership, and Firm Performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 38 :163 - 184.
  • 3The Accounting Standards Board (ASB). 1995. Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting (exposure draft).
  • 4Yermack, D.. 1996. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors, Journal of Financial Economics,40:185-211.
  • 5Aghion, P. , and J. Tirole. 1997. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations, Journal of Political Economy, 105 ( 1 ) : 1 - 29.
  • 6Agrawal, A. , and C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (3) : 377 -397.
  • 7Bebchuk, L. A. , J. M. Fried, and D. I. Walker. 2002. Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation, University of Chicago Law Review, 69 (3) : 751 -846.
  • 8Bebchuk, L. A. , and J. M. Fried. 2003. Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17:71-92.
  • 9Bhagat, S. , and B. Black. 1999. The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Perormance, Business Lawyer, 54 (3): 921-963.
  • 10Bhagat, S. , and B. Black. 2002. The Non - Correlation between Board Independence and Long - Term Firm Perormance,The Journal of Corporation Law, 27 (winter) : 231 -273.

共引文献219

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部