期刊文献+

大学英语四级完型填空题之元功能思想探讨 被引量:1

The Study of the Metafunctions in the Cloze Test of CET-4
下载PDF
导出
摘要 完型填空作为大学英语四级考试中测试学生语言综合素质的题型,其设计应当体现语言作为意义潜势系统的规律性和多样性,实现并增强测试的科学性,减少删词和选项的任意性。韩礼德所提出的元功能思想为完型填空测试提供了理论依据和指导,有助于还原和模拟真实语境下的语言使用机制,并从整体上把握测试的效度。对2006年6月大学英语四级考试实施新题型以来四套试卷中的完型填空题进行分析,可以说明元功能思想在完型填空题中的命题意义和依据。 Cloze test as the part to test the comprehensive language competence of testees in CET - 4 should realize the regularity and variability of language as meaning potentials so that the test can be more valid and the deletion as well as choices should be less random, The Hallidayan framework of metafunctions contributes to the simulation of language mechanism in use with theoretical guidance and the validity of the test can be enhanced. By means of the analysis of the four doze tests of the new type of CET - 4 since June, 2006 the significance of the metafunctions in doze test can be manifested.
出处 《四川教育学院学报》 2008年第7期74-76,共3页 Journal of Sichuan College of Education
关键词 完型填空 元功能思想 交际能力:意义潜势 cloze test metafunctions communicative competence meaning potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈晓扣,李绍山.TEM-4完型填空测试结构效度研究——答题过程分析法[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):71-77. 被引量:43
  • 2OLLER, J. Language Tests at School [ M ]. London: Longman, 1979.
  • 3ALDERSON, J C , C Clapham and D Wall. Language Test Construction and Evaluation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 4BACHMAN, L F. Fundamental Consideration in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • 5DASTJENDI, H V and M Pt. Talebinezhad. Chainpreserving deletion procedure in cloze: a diseoursal perspeetive[J]. Language Testing, 2006, 23(1 ): 58- 72.
  • 6Ruixia Yan. On "chain-preserving deletion procedure in cloze": A Reply to Dastjerdi and Talebinezhad [ J ]. Language Testing, 2006, 23 (3) : 402 - 407.
  • 7BACHMAN, L F. Performance on cloze tests with fixed - ratio and rational deletions [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly, 1985, (19) : 535 - 536.
  • 8HALLIDAY, M A K. Language as Social Semiotic: The social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978:32.
  • 9HALLIDAY, M A K. Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.

二级参考文献21

  • 1金艳,郭杰克.大学英语四、六级考试非面试型口语考试效度研究[J].外语界,2002(5):72-79. 被引量:97
  • 2金艳,吴江.以“内省”法检验CET阅读理解测试的效度[J].外语界,1998(2):48-53. 被引量:38
  • 3陈晓扣,郑庆珠.论英语词汇测试中的高低、一致原则[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2000,23(6):64-66. 被引量:7
  • 4American Psychological Association. 1985. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • 5Bachman, L. F. 1985. Performance on cloze tests with fixed-ratio and rational deletions [J]. TESOL Quarterly 19(3): 535-556.
  • 6Bachman, L. F. 2000. Modem language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts [J]. Language Testing 17(1): 1-42.
  • 7Bachman L F &A D Cohen.Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research[M].北京:外语教育学与研究出版社,2002..
  • 8Bachman, L. F. & A. S. Palmer. 1981. The construct validation of the FSI oral interview [J]. Language Learning 31(1) : 67-89.
  • 9Bachman, L. F. & A. S. Palmer. 1982. The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency[J]. TESOL Quarterly 16(4) : 449-65.
  • 10Cohen, A. D. 1984. On taking language tests: What the students report [J]. Language Testing 1: 70- 81.

共引文献42

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部