1BAIRD R A,JACKSON S T. Fracture of the distal part of the fibula with associated disruption of the deltoid ligament. Treatment without repair of the deltoid ligament . J Bone joint Surg, 1987, 69A1346-1352.
2LAUGE-HANSEN N. Fractures of ankle.Ⅱ. Combined experi mentalsurgical and experimental- roentgenologic investigations. Arch Surg, 1950,60,957-985.
3DE VIRES J S, WIJGMAN A J, SIEREVELT I N. et al. Long-- term results of ankle fraelures with a posterior malleolar fragment. J Foot Aukle Surg, 2005, 44:211-217.
5Lauge-hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. III. Geneticroentgeno logic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle[J]. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Meal,1954,71(3) :456-471.
6Lauge- hansen N. Fractures of the ankle, Ⅳ. Clinical use of genetic roentgen diagnosis and genetic reduction [J]. Am A Arch Surg, 1952,64(4) :488-500.
7Gourineni PV, Knuth AE, Nuber GF. Radiographicevaluation of the position of implants in the medialmalleolus in relation to the ankle joint space:anteroposterior compard with mortise radiographsEJ]. JBone Joint Surg(Am), 1999,81 (3) : 364-369.
8FEDERICIA, SANGUINETIF, SANTOLINIF. The closed treat ment of severe malleolar fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 1993,59 (2) :189-196.
9Maynou C, Lesage P, Mestdgh H, etal. Is surgical treatment of deltoid ligament rupture necessary in ankle fractures Rev Chir Orhop Reparatriee Appar Mot, 1997,83 : 652-657.
