摘要
目的:探讨妊娠高血压疾病患者血液流变学参数和血液动力学的变化特点。方法:用普利生LYB-N6A型全自动血粘度仪和无创伤心血管参数测量仪对120例妊娠高血压疾病患者、150例正常妊娠妇女及100例正常对照者进行血流变学和血液动力学指标检测。结果:3组间有不同的血液流变学和血液动力学。正常妊娠组和正常对照组间的全血粘度、血浆粘度、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、心脏指数(CI)、心搏量(SV)、心搏指数(SI)及血管顺应性(AC)之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而妊娠高血压组的全血粘度、血浆粘度、平均动脉压明显高于正常对照组和正常妊娠组(P<0.05),心输出量、心脏指数、心搏量、心搏指数及血管顺应性则明显低于正常对照组和正常妊娠组(P<0.05)。结论:监测孕妇血液流变学和血液动力学多项指标,有助于预测妊娠高血征疾病的发生、发展和严重程度,对妊娠高血压的治疗有一定的临床指导意义。
Objective: To explore changes of blood dynamics parameters and hemorrheology in normal control, normal pregnancy and pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) . Methods: The subjects were divided into three groups, including normal control (100 persons), normal pregnancy group (150) and PIH group (120). Automatic machine of blood viscosity and non-invasive cardiovascular parameters surveyor were used to measure blood dynamics parameters and hemorrheology of different groups. Results: Discrepant blood dynamics parameters and hemorrheology were found among three groups. The whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, average arterial pressure (MAP) , cardiac output (CO) , cardiac index (CI) , stroke volumes (SV) , stroke index (SI) and anglo-compliance (AC) between normal control and normal pregnancy had no statistical difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). But whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, MAP in PIH were obviously higher than those in normal control group and normal pregnancy ( P 〈 0. 05 ), on the contrary CO, CI, SV, SI and AC were less than those in normal control group and normal pregnancy significantly ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . Conclusion: Monitoring blood dynamics parameters and hemorrheology is conductive to predict outset, development and severity of PIH. Furthermore, it could helpful for treatment on PIH.
出处
《中国妇幼保健》
CAS
北大核心
2008年第24期3380-3381,共2页
Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词
血液流变学
血液动力学
血粘度
妊娠高血压疾病
Hemorrheology
Blood dynamics parameters
Blood viscosity
Pregnancy induced hypertension