期刊文献+

中国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究 被引量:8

An Empirical Study on the China's Listed Companies Merging Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 市场总体上对并购事件产生了积极的反应,在并购日后几天,出现了超额收益;并购当年和第一年业绩好转,得到了短期改善,但是随着时间的推移,仅仅在并购后的第二年就有了下滑的趋势。在四种并购类型的样本分析中,可以看出购买股权和母公司改造类上市公司的业绩改善明显,而无偿划拨类上市公司无明显变化,再次说明政府控制决策的影响是短期的,不能真正提高市场的有效机制。 The paper carries out an empirical study using case study method and financial indicators evaluation method on the performance of listed companies in China. The paper draws the following conclusions: the M & A (Merger and acquisition) market as a whole responses positively to the merging, with a surplus income in M & A a few days later; there is a short-term improvement of the M & A in the merging year and the successive year, but as time passes by, in the second year after the merger there is a downward turn; in the sample analysis on the four types of merge and acquisitions, we can see that the performance in the parent company and the category of listed companies has seen significant improvement, and the free transfer listed companies has not seen significant change. This again shows the impact of the government control of the decision - making in the short term, but can not really raise the effective market mechanism.
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 2008年第8期68-72,共5页 Journal of Statistics and Information
关键词 并购绩效 事件研究法 财务指标评价法 merging performance case study financial indicators of price evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Roll R. 1986, "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers", Journal of Business 59. 197-216.
  • 2Shlerifer A, R W Vishny, 2003, "Stock Market Driven Acquisitions", Journal of Financial Economics 70. 295-311.
  • 3Cao Y, Y Qian, B Weingast, 1999,"From Federalism. Chinese Style, To Privatization, Chinese Style", Economics of Transition 7.103-131.
  • 4Chen D , J P H Fan, T J Wang, 200d.,"Politicalled-Connected Ceos, Helping Hand or Grabbing Hand?" Working Paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics and HKUST.
  • 5Denis D , J J Mcconnell, 2003, "International Corporate Governance", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38. 1-36.
  • 6Friedman E, S Johnson, T Mittton, 2003,"Propping and Tunneling", Journal of Comparative Economics 31. 732-750.
  • 7Jarrell G A, Briekley J A, and Netter J M. 1988,"The Market For Corporate Control. The Empirical Evidence Since 1980",Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (Winter), 49-68.
  • 8Jensen M C, W H Meckling, 1976,"Theory of The Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3. 305-360.
  • 9Jensen M, and Ruback R S. 1983, "The Market For Corporate Control. The Scientific Evidence", Journal of Financial Economics 11 .5-50.
  • 10Jensen M C. 1986,"Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers". American Economic Review 76. 323-329.

共引文献977

同被引文献71

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部