摘要
教唆犯的未遂是共同犯罪理论中最为复杂的问题之一。人们习惯于从立法之实然对教唆犯进行研究,使得对教唆犯的未遂形态的认定仅限制在《刑法》第二十九条第二款的规定上,从本条的立法精神来看,我国《刑法》规定被教唆人没有实施被教唆之罪也成立教唆犯未遂,然而这一规定并不合理。对于教唆犯的未遂形态的认定,不应囿于立法之实然规定,应该站在应然高度对教唆犯予以定位。
Abettor's attempted is in the joint offense theory one of most complex questions. The people are accustomed to however conduct the research reality of from the legislative to the abettor, causes to abettor's attempted shape to recognize that only limits in "Criminal law" in the 29th second article of stipulation, looking from this strip's legislative spirit, our country criminal law approves has been instigated the person implementation not to instigate the crime also to establish the abettor attempted position. However, this stipulation is by no means reasonable. Regarding abettor's attempted shape's recognizing, should not reality of however stipulation constrained by the legislative, be supposed to stand in the theory should however locate highly to the abettor.
出处
《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》
2008年第4期72-76,共5页
Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
关键词
教唆犯
未遂形态
共犯
正犯
abettor
attempted shape, accomplice
principal offender