期刊文献+

新研制自锁托槽与传统翼结扎托槽摩擦力的比较(英文) 被引量:2

Comparison of frictional force between newly developed self-locking brackets and conventional tie-wing brackets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:进口自锁托槽价格昂贵,需要开发成本低、易操作的国产自锁托槽。目的:介绍一种新式托槽,并观察新研制自锁托槽的摩擦力。设计、时间及地点:生物力学对比实验,于2004-01在哈尔滨医科大学实验室完成。材料:自制自锁托槽和国产传统翼结扎不锈钢托槽各10个;国产Ni-Ti圆丝、澳大利亚不锈钢圆丝、国产不锈钢方丝各10根。方法:两种托槽与3种弓丝分别组合分组。在微电机的驱动下,以1mm/min的速度拖动拉力传感器,使另一端结扎在托槽内的弓丝受拉移动,模拟矫治过程中牙齿移动情况。主要观察指标:在存储示波器上观察波形并读取数据,测出各组摩擦力进行比较。结果:在其他条件相同的情况下,无论与哪种弓丝组合,翼结扎托槽的摩擦力均远大于自锁托槽(P<0.001)。无论与哪种托槽组合,Ni-Ti丝的摩擦力远大于澳丝和不锈钢方丝(P<0.001),方丝的摩擦力大于澳丝(P<0.01)。结论:自锁托槽属低摩擦托槽,符合口腔正畸科临床医生施加矫治力的要求。 BACKGROUND: Imported self-locking brackets cost much. So it is necessary to develop low-cost and easy-to-operate domestic self-locking brackets. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a newly developed self-locking brackets, and investigate the frictional forces of the brackets. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Biomechanical controlled analysis was performed in the Laboratory of Harbin Medical University in January 2004. MATERIALS: Self-made self-locking brackets and domestic conventional tie-wing stainless steel brackets; domestic Ni-Ti round wire, Australian stainless steel round wire, and domestic stainless steel rectangular wire. METHODS: Two kinds of brackets were combined with three kinds of arch wires. Under the drive of micromotor, pull sensor moved at I mm/min. An arch wire, which was ligated in the bracket, was dragged. Thus, teeth's shift was imitated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Waveshape was observed through the use of storage oscillograph and corresponding data were recorded. Frictional force was determined and compared. RESULTS: Under the same other conditions, no matter which kind of arch wires were combined with, tie-wing brackets produced greater frictional force than self-locking brackets (P 〈 0.001 ). Under the same other conditions, no matter which kind of brackets were combined with, Ni-Ti wire produced greater frictional force than Australian stainless steel round wire and domestic stainless steel rectangular wire (P 〈 0.001 ). In addition, domestic stainless steel rectangular wires produced greater frictional force than Australian stainless steel round wires (P 〈 0.001 ). CONCLUSION: Self-locking bracket produces low frictional force, so it is fit for orthodontic doctors to use the corrective force.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第30期5993-5996,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献90

共引文献54

同被引文献35

  • 1姜若萍.自锁托槽矫治技术与高效矫治[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(1):16-20. 被引量:24
  • 2丁鹏(综述),周彦恒(审校),林久祥(审校).白锁托槽矫治器的发展、分类及特点[J].口腔正畸学,2006,13(1):40-43. 被引量:35
  • 3谭忠荣,叶翁三杰.自锁托槽和传统直丝弓托槽弓丝结扎时间的对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(4):445-447. 被引量:13
  • 4俞昳丽,钱玉芬.自锁托槽的临床应用及研究进展[J].上海口腔医学,2007,16(4):431-435. 被引量:20
  • 5Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, et al. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or thop, 2010,137(6):726.e 1-726.e 18.
  • 6Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conven tional vs self-ligating brackets: Effects of archwire size and material [J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007,131(3):395-399.
  • 7Sergio P, Icopo C, Giorgio I, et all Time efficiency of self- ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems [J].Progress in orthodon ties,2008,9(2):74-80.
  • 8Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham S J, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(2):160-167.
  • 9Tecco S,D'Attilio M,Tete S,et al. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment [J].European journal of orthodontics,2009,31 (4): 380-384.
  • 10Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of eonven tional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems[J]. Am J Ortbod Dentofaeial Orthop,1994,106(5):472-480.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部