经桡动脉和股动脉途径行脑血管造影的对比分析

Comparative analysis on radial artery and femoral artery approaches for cerebral angiography

目的比较经桡动脉和经股动脉途径行脑血管造影的优缺点。方法同期82例拟做脑血管造影的患者,按股动脉途径和桡动脉途径分为两组,比较其穿刺时间、穿刺成功率、X线照射时间、制动时间及穿刺部位并发症。结果股动脉血管穿刺成功率高于桡动脉组,穿刺时间小于桡动脉组,股动脉组术后并发症高于桡动脉组。结论经桡动脉途径脑血管造影安全可行,并发症少,适合于择期造影者及老年人。经股动脉途径脑血管造影穿刺时间短,成功率高,适用于急症患者。

Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of cerebral angiography through the radial artery and the femoral artery approaches. Methods According to the approach way, 82 patients were divided into two groups： femoral artery group and radial artery group. After cerebral angiography the puncture time, the successful rate of puncture, the X-ray exposure time, the time of procedure and the complication of puncture site were compared between the two groups. Results In femoral artery group, the successful rate was higher and the time of puncture was shorter, but the complication was higher than that of radial artery group. Conclusions For cerebral angiography, through radial artey approach is feasible and safe better to be adopted for the elderly or the prescheduled case, but the femoral artery approach is suitable for the emergency.