期刊文献+

非手术方法治疗成人反患者软组织疗效分析研究 被引量:2

To research the parenchyma effect by means of nonoperation to treat the patients of adult crossbite
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比非手术方法治疗成人反患者矫治前后软组织的头影测量分析结果,从而确定此种方法的疗效。方法:选用常规拔除前磨牙方法,利用标准方丝弓矫治技术辅以多曲方丝弓技术治疗恒牙期骨性Ⅲ类错畸形患者15例。通过软组织头影测量分析方法,比较治疗前后患者侧貌变化。结果:①软组织改善明显,侧貌更接近正常。②NLA平均减少9.50°,LLL平均减少2.85°,ULP平均增大1.30°,LLP平均减少2.30°,H角平均增大2.10°。③H线与软组织侧面的关系,鼻点-H线(mm)平均减少3.00mm,鼻唇沟-H线(mm)平均增加2.10mm,下唇突点-H线(mm)平均减少1.95mm,颏唇沟-H线(mm)平均增加1.75mm。结论:非手术方法治疗成人反患者,从软组织角度来看,可取得相对满意疗效。 Objective To compare the results of parenchyma cephalometrics analysis before with after orthodontic treatment to ensure the effect when adults crossbite was treated by means of nonoperative treatment. Methods To extract four premolars. Edgewise appliance with MEAW was adopted to treat 15 patients of true skeletal Classlll malocclusion. X-ray Parenchyma Cephalometrics was adopted to compare patients' changes of profile before with after the orthodontic treatment. Results (1)The parenchyma changed obviously. The profile is more close to normal state. (2) NLA decreased by 9.50°. LLL decreased by 2.85°, ULP increased by 1.30°; LLP decreased by 2.30°. H Angle increased by 2.10°, (3)The relations of H Line and parenchyma profile :Nose-H Line (mm) decreased by 3.00mm; Nasolabial groove--H Line (mm) increased by 2.10mm; Labium superius- H Line (mm) decreased by 1.95mm; Mentolabial groove- H Line (mm) increased by 1.75mm. Conclusion To treat adult crossbite by means of nonoperative treatment can obtain satisfying parenchyma effect.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2008年第8期1203-1205,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
基金 黑龙江省科技厅攻关资助项目(项目名称:非手术方法治疗成人反患者咬合关系和面型改善的研究 编号:GC06C40603)
关键词 成人反[牙合] 多曲方丝弓技术 软组织头影测量分析 adults crossbite MEAW parenchyma cephalometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1AlexanderRG,TheAlexanderDisciplineGlendorOrmcoCorporation,1986
  • 2EnlowDH,kurodaTandLecoisABIntrinsiccraniofacialcompensations,AngleOrthod1971;41:271-285
  • 3大熊信幸等,咬合平面の成长に伴ラ变化につし、て,北海道杂志,1992:20:7-16
  • 4吉田秀治等,MEAWテクニツクにょゐ非拔齿成人治验例につし、て,日成人矫杂志,1995;77-83
  • 5吉武崇等.思春期にポし、て下颚骨の著レし、年间成长量在な示レた十二骨格性,下颚前突症例,明海大杂志,1998;27:319-327
  • 6Kim.AnteriorOpenbiteanditsTreatmentwithMaltiloopEdgewiseAvch-wires,AngleOrthod1987;57:290-321
  • 7Walther.OrthodonticNotesandedJohnWrightandSonsBiisto1967;123-133
  • 8Nezu.OrthodonticDiagnosisandTreatmentinBioprogressiveTherapy
  • 9Kim.Dr-Kim讲义ノ-ト日本MEAW研究会
  • 10铃村直也等.矫正治疗にょゐ咬合平面の变化と要定性につし、て,日矫杂志,1989;48:404-410

共引文献60

同被引文献24

  • 1武传君,田军.成人安氏Ⅱ类2分类错非拔牙矫治9例疗效分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(2):91-93. 被引量:3
  • 2林久祥,许天民,赵志河,等.口腔正畸学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 3Armijo BS, Brown M, Guyuron B. Defining the ideal naso- labial angle [ J ] .Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,129 (3) :759-764.
  • 4Nandini S, Prashanth CS, Somiah SK, Reddy SR. An eval- uation of nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip[J]. Contemp Dent Pratt, 2011,12 (3):152-157.
  • 5FarhadB, Naini. Facial Aesthetic: Concepts and Clinical Diagnosis [ M ]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2011.
  • 6Kandhasamy K. Evaluation of the nasolabiat angle of the Komarapalayam population [J]. Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2012,4(Suppl 2):s313-315.
  • 7Dua V, Gupta S, Singh C. Evaluation of the nasolabial an- gle in the Indian population [ J ]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2010, 1(2):79-82.
  • 8Magnani MB, Nouer DF, Nouer PR, edt. Assessment of the nasolabial angle in young Brazilian black subjects with normal occlusion[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2004 Jul-Sep, 18(3): 233-237.
  • 9Biller JA, Kim DW. A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences [J]. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 2009 Mar-Apr, 11(2):91-97.
  • 10Sukhia RH, Sukhia HR, Fida M, edt. Nasolabial angle: a perception of treatment needs [J]. Int J Orthod Milwau- kee, 2012 Summer,23(2):41-44.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部