期刊文献+

3种抗生素治疗急性呼吸道感染成本—效果分析

3种抗生素治疗急性呼吸道感染成本—效果分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价3种抗生素治疗急性呼吸道感染的经济学效果。方法将188例急性呼吸道感染患者随机分为A左氧氟沙星组(68例)、B环丙沙星组(56例)、C莫西沙星组(64例),用成本—效果分析法进行评价。结果A、B、C三组的治愈率分别为73.53%、85.71%和93.75%(P〈0.05);成本分别为397.60元、1131.90元和2255.40元(P〈0.05);成本—效果比分别为5.40、13.20和24.05。B、C组相对于A组的增量成本—效果比分别是60.28和91。87,3组均未发生与治疗药物相关的严重不良反应。结论A组方案(左氧氟沙星)最经济。 Objective To evaluated the economic effectiveness of 3 antibiotics for acute lower respiratory infection. Methods 188 cases of acute lower respiratory infection were randomly divided into the A levofloxacin (68 cases) group, B ciprofloxacin (56 cases) group and C moxifloxacin (64cases) group. The costeffectiveness analysis was adopted to evaluate the treatment effect. Results The cure rates of Group A, B and C were 73.53%, 85.71% and 93.75% (P〈0.05) respectively. The cost was 397.60 yuan, 1131.90 yuan and 2255.40 yuan (P〈0.05) respectively, and the cost- effectiveness ratios was 5.40, 13.20 and 24.05. The increment cost-effectiveness ratios of B, C group compared with A group was 60.28 and 91.87 respectively. No severe adverse reactions related to the treatment drugs were found in the 3 groups. Conclusion Group A (levofloxacin) is the most economic.
出处 《当代医学》 2008年第6期9-10,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 急性呼吸道感染 氟喹诺酮类药物 成本—效果分析 acute lower respiratory infection fluoroquinolones cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

共引文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部