期刊文献+

基于等待时间和信道状态的轮询多址协议 被引量:4

Polling Multiple Access Protocol Based on the Waiting Time and Channel State
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了基于分组等待时间和信道状态的动态限定轮询多址协议.该协议根据各节点内分组的当前等待时间及信道状态动态地控制轮询过程,每个轮询周期对具有分组最长等待时间和好的信道状态的节点进行服务.在假设信道为两状态马尔可夫模型的基础上,通过采用嵌入马尔可夫链理论和休假排队模型,给出该协议的理论模型和性能分析,并且通过与基本轮询系统对比分析,可以看出所提系统缩短了分组的平均等待时间,提高了系统的吞吐量. Dynamic limited polling multiple access protocol based on waiting time of packets and chan- nel state is proposed. This protocol adaptively controls the polling process according to the instantaneous waiting time of packets and the channel state for each node, and serves the one with the longest packet waiting time and good channel state first in each polling cycle. By means of imbedded Markov chain theory and vacation queue model, the model and its performance analysis of that protocol are given assuming that channel is modeled as a two-state Markov chain. By comparing with the basic polling system, it is shown that the proposed system can reduce the mean waiting time of packets and increase system throughput.
出处 《北京邮电大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期126-129,共4页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60362001,F0424104)
关键词 等待时间和信道状态 轮询多址 Gillbert-Elliott信道模型 休假排队模型 平均时延 吞吐量 waiting time and channel state polling multiple access Gillbert-Elliott channel model vacation queue model mean waiting time throughput
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Konheim A G. Descendent set: an efficient approach for analysis of polling systems [J ]. IEEE Transaction on Communication, 1994, 42(8): 1245-1253.
  • 2刘强,张中兆,张乃通.排队优先权站点轮询系统的平均周期时间[J].通信学报,1999,20(2):86-91. 被引量:20
  • 3Zheng J, Mouftah H T. Adaptive scheduling algorithms for Ethernet passive optical networks communications [J ]. IEEE Proceedings-Communications, 2005, 152 (5) : 643-647.
  • 4Zhang Yumei, Zhao Dongfeng. Analysis on the dynamic length of queue polling protocol for IEEE802.11 wireless LANs[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth Joint International Computer Conference, JICC '04. Kunming: International Academic Publishers/World Publishing Corporation, 2004: 220-224.
  • 5张宇眉,杨大成,赵东风,张欣.基于队长参数的动态限定轮询多址协议分析[J].北京邮电大学学报,2007,30(3):54-57. 被引量:3
  • 6Liu Qingwen, Wang Xin, Giannakis G B. A cross-layer scheduling algorithm with QoS support in wireless networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2006, 55(3): 839-847.
  • 7Fumio I, Gang U H. Delay performance under the joint scheduling over Gilbert-Elliot channel [ C] // Proceedings of Wireless Telecommunications Symposium. Pomona: IEEE, 2006: 1-7.
  • 8Mowcheng L. Discrete-time limited 1-customer G/G/1 vacation queueing systems and asymmetric polling systems [ C ] // Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference. Singapore: IEEE, 1995: 92-96.

二级参考文献8

共引文献21

同被引文献27

  • 1李琰,赵东风,丁洪伟,高飞.轮询多址通信系统门限服务策略研究[J].通信学报,2005,26(3):99-105. 被引量:9
  • 2何敏,赵东风,刘心松.移动Ad hoc网络分布式并行接入控制协议分析[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(3):443-448. 被引量:4
  • 3吴宗华,赵东风.中心站点和普通站点完全服务排队系统分析[J].计算机工程与应用,2007,43(16):116-117. 被引量:3
  • 4张宇眉,杨大成,赵东风,张欣.基于队长参数的动态限定轮询多址协议分析[J].北京邮电大学学报,2007,30(3):54-57. 被引量:3
  • 5Bianchi G. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function[ J ]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2000, 18 ( 3 ) : 535- 547.
  • 6Ergen M, Lee D, Sengupta R, et al. Wireless token ring protocol performance comparison with IEEE 802.11 [ C]// ISCC 2003. Antalya: [s.n. ], 2003: 710-715.
  • 7Lee D, Attias R, Purl A, et al. A wireless token ring protocol for Ad Hoc networks[C]////Aerospace Conference 2002. Montana: [s.n.], 2002: 1219-1228.
  • 8Sun Xianpu, Zhang Yanling, Li Jiandong. Wireless dynamic token protocol for MANET[C] // ICPPW 2007. Xi'an: [s.n. ], 2007: 5.
  • 9Johnson E, Tang Zibin, Balakrishnan M, et al. Robust token management for unreliable networks [ C ]// IEEE MILCOM 2003. Boston: [s.n. ], 2003: 399-404.
  • 10Johnson E, Anaya G, Tang Zibin, et al. Performance of the HF token protocol [ C ] // IEEE MILCOM 2004. Monterey: [s.n.], 2004: 1021-1027.

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部