期刊文献+

R&D与广告对中日家电企业技术效率影响的比较研究 被引量:12

The Comparison on the Impacts of R&D and Advertising on Technical Efficiency of Chinese and Japanese Household Appliance Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于DEA和SFA模型,本文首先分析了2001-2005年间中日两国家电上市企业的市场势力效率和盈利效率这两类技术效率;其次,在构造DEA-TOBIT和Battese&Coelli(1995)SFA这两个计量模型的基础上,进一步研究了企业R&D与广告宣传这两种市场竞争策略对这两类技术效率的当期和累计影响效果。结果显示,非参数估计DEA和参数估计SFA这两个方法在中日家电企业技术效率评价方面取得了较为一致的结果;同时,所构造的DEA-TOBIT和SFA这两个计量模型也显示了在竞争性家电制造业中,R&D对企业市场势力效率和盈利效率的累积影响效果均为积极显著,但却未能证实长期内广告宣传对这两类技术效率的积极效果。 Based on SFA and DEA approaches and on the sample of dozens of Chinese and Japanese household appliance listed companies during 2001 to 2005, this paper makes a comparative study on the firm's market power efficiency and profitability efficiency. Then makes an exploratory research on the effect of R&D and advertising to the two types of firm technical efficiencies by DEA-TOBIT and Battese & Coelli (1995) SFA models. The empirical results show that R&D impact significantly and positively the two technical efficiencies in long--term in highly competitive household appliance industry, however the similar relation between advertising and the two technical efficiencies cannot be verified.
作者 何枫 陈荣
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第4期140-147,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70502003) 北京科技大学422高层次人才基金(2007305)
关键词 R&D 广告 技术效率 DEA SFA research development advertising technical efficiency DEA SFA
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Young, B. H. and Pagan, J. A. Executive compensation and corporate production efficiency: a stochastic frontier approach [J]. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 2003, 41(1/2): 27-41.
  • 2Green, W. and Segal, D. Profitability and efficiency in U.S. life insurance industry [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 21: 229-247.
  • 3Habib, M. and Ljungvist, A. Firm value and managerial incentives: a stochastic frontier approach [J]. Journal of Business, 2005, 78: 2053-93.
  • 4Toru, H. , Jamasb, T. , and Pollitt, M. Electricity distribution in UK and Japan: a comparative efficiency analysis 1985-1998 [J]. The Energy Journal, 2005, 26 (2) : 23-48.
  • 5Kneller, R. and Stevens, P.A. Frontier technology and absorptive capacity: evidence from OECD manufacturing industries [J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics And Statistics, 200G, 68(1): 1-21.
  • 6HE Feng and CHEN Rong. Innovation, Firm Efficiency and Firm Value: Firm-level Evidence in Japanese Electricity Machinery Industry [C]. The Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Services and Knowledge Management, Sep. 23-25, 2007, Shanghai, China.
  • 7Cooper, W. W. , Kumbhakar, S. , Tharll, R. and YU Xuelin. DEA and stochastic frontier analysis of the 1978 Chinese economic reforms[J]. Socioecon Planning Science, 1995, 29(2): 85-112.
  • 8Shiu, A. Efficiency of Chinese enterprises [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2002, 18 : 255-267.
  • 9刘小玄.中国工业企业的所有制结构对效率差异的影响——1995年全国工业企业普查数据的实证分析[J].经济研究,2000,35(2):17-25. 被引量:448
  • 10ZHENG Jinhai, LIU Xiaoxuan and Bigsten, A. Ownership structure and determinants and technical efficiency: an application of DEA to Chinese enterprises [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, 26: 465-484.

二级参考文献41

共引文献868

同被引文献254

引证文献12

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部