期刊文献+

美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIHSS)中文版多中心测评研究--附537例缺血中风多中心多时点临床测评研究 被引量:442

Study on multi-center investigation of the Chinese version of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的依托国家十五攻关课题,采用美国国立卫生院卒中量表(the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS)中文版,对我国脑卒中人群进行信度、效度和敏感度的多中心、大样本研究。方法信度检验用Cronbach'sα系数、Guttman Split-half和spearson相关系数(重测信度)来评价。采用人为推理判断方法评价内容效度;采用因子分析法考核量表的结构效度;通过相关分析考察量表的效标效度。各领域敏感度通过配对t检验来评估。结果完成随访评定537例。NIH-SS中文版除0 d和7 d外,有较好的条目内部一致性,各领域的重测信度除共济运动、凝视外,其他维度的重测信度系数均在0.5-1之间。各时点的累计贡献率范围为88.6%-90.17%,具有很好的结构效度;哥拉斯格结局量表(Glasgow Outcome Scale,GOS),Barthel生活能力指数(Barthel In-dex,BI)为效标,NIHSS与二者相关性高。12个领域显示了理想的敏感度。除7 d的凝视、忽视外,NIHSS总分及各条目在各个时点有较好敏感度。结论NIHSS中译本是一个有很好信度、效度和敏感度的卒中量表,中医药研究治疗急性缺血中风适合使用急性前循环卒中的疗效评价。 Objective To investigate the reliability,validity and responsiveness of Chinese version of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)in big sample patients of multi-center with stroke in China.Methods The reliability was evaluated in 537 inpatients by using Cronbach's α coefficient,Guttman Split-half and Spearson correlation coefficient.The content validity of NIHSS was studied with the method of subjective reasoning and judging.The construct validity was assessed with factor analysis.Criterion validity of individual domains was assessed by comparing the linear association of the domain score with the score of these scales.Domain responsiveness was assessed with Paired Ttest.Results All scales of 14 d and 21 d showed better internal consistent.Most domains except gaze and ataxia domain demonstrated excellent reliability in test retest(Spearson correlation coefficient ranged 0.5-1).All 12 domains demonstrated excellent constract validity(accumulative dedication rate ranged from 88.6 to 90.17%). NIHSS total score and every item of the most domains in different time points except gaze domain of 7d were responsive.NIHSS showed high correlation with Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)and Barthel Index(BI).Conclusion The Chinese version of NIHSS is a reliable,valid and responsive scale and is suitable for assessing the therapeutic effect of Chinese medicine on stroke at acute phase.
出处 《北京中医药大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期494-498,共5页 Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家科技支撑计划重大项目(No.2006BAI04A02) 国家科技十五攻关项目(No.2004BA721A02,2001BA701A12b) 广东省科技厅科技攻关项目(No.2005B33001019) 广东省自然科学基金项目(No.06301402)
关键词 脑血管意外 量表 信度 效度 敏感度 cerebrovascular accident scale reliability validity responsiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1BOGOUSSLAVSKY J, HENNERICI MG. Stroke scores and scales[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1992, 2:239.
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33022
  • 3BAMFORD J, DENNIS M, SANDERCOCK P, et al. The frequency, causes and timing of death within 30 days of acute stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) [ J ]. J Neurology Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1990,53 : 824 - 29.
  • 4郭爱华.实用医学调查分析技术[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2005.262.
  • 5TZU K S,SU C C ,SHU H Y,Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke scale: Scale development [ J ]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006,43:457-463.
  • 6王新,王拥军,刘峥,曲镭.四个脑卒中量表信度与效度的对比研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,1999,21(3):140-143. 被引量:48
  • 7GOLDSTEIN LB, SAMSA GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale: extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial[J]. Stroke, 1997, 28:307 -310.
  • 8TILLEY BC, MARLER J, GELLER NL. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Trial Study. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial [ J ]. Stroke, 1996,27 : 2136 - 2142.

二级参考文献2

  • 1陈清棠.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29:381-382.
  • 2中华医学会神经病学分会,中华神经科杂志,1996年,29卷,381页

共引文献33061

同被引文献4174

引证文献442

二级引证文献3096

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部