期刊文献+

准备时间和预先信息对任务切换的影响 被引量:5

Effects of Preparation Time and Foreknowledge on Task Switching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 两个实验采用任务线索范式,考察了准备时间和预先信息对任务切换的影响。实验1的准备时间为可预测,实验2的为不可预测,以考察准备时间的可预测性对任务切换的影响。以被试执行重复任务、切到任务和切离任务的正确反应时为主要指标,结果:(1)在准备时间可预测和不可预测两种条件下,准备时间和预先信息之间存在显著交互作用。在可预测条件中,重复和切到任务的反应时随着准备时间的增加而减少,但切到代价无显著变化,切离任务的反应时不受准备时间的影响,切离代价表现出反准备效应;不可预测条件下,三种任务的反应时都随着准备时间的增加而减少,但是切到和切离代价表现出反准备效应;(2)切离任务的反应时和代价显著高于切到任务的反应时和代价;(3)在这两种条件下,都没有出现切换代价的准备效应。 Recently, Task switching is an important paradi^n for studying executive control. Switching cost refer to the performance differences in task-switch and task-repeat trims. Many issues and problems need further exploration. Theoretically, there is disagreement as to whether switch costs actually represents the task-set reconfiguration or the task- set inertia. Many studies have found that a prolonged preparation time reduces switch costs, which has been attributed to a task set reconfiguration process. However, unlike manipulations of preparation time, other studies have varied the predictability of task sequence and found that the preparation benefit was the same for switches and repetitions. The present study explored the interaction of preparation time and foreknowledge in task switching. In addition, in order to study the effects of preparation time predictability on the task switching, the preparation time (CSI) was manipulated by blocked or randomized within subjects. Two explicit task-cuing experiments were used with the same materials and procedure, preparation times of 150ms and 900ms, and foreknowledge of the full-and the partial-foreknowledge. The full-foreknowledge specified both task transition and task identity. The partial-foreknowledge specified only task transition information. The response-stimulus interval was constant at 800ms, to control the amount of repetition priming from the previous trial. To examine the effect of preparation time predictability on the preparation effects of switch costs, in experiment 1, the preparation time was blocked within subjects, and in experiment 2, the preparation time was randomized within subjects. The RT was measured as the main index. Repeated-measure ANOVA was performed for experiment 1 and 2. The results revealed that: (1) Under the conditions of preparation time predictability and unpredictability, the interaction between the preparation time and the foreknowledge was significant. Under the condition of predictability, the RT of repeat task and switch-to task trials decreased with increasing preparation time, but there are no significant differences in switch-to cost; the RT of switch- away task is affected by preparation time, and switch-away cost advanced with prolonging preparation time. Under the condition of unpredictability, the RT of three types of tasks reduced with rising preparation time, but both of switch-to and switch-away cost went up. (2) Compared to the switch-to task, the RT and switch cost of the switch-away task were longer. (3) Under of the two conditions, there is not the preparation effect. The experimental results suggest that the switch cost may represent the preparation of the new task set and a residual component, and the task switching was not effected by the predictability of the preparation time.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期873-882,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"思维过程中的执行加工与自我监控:事件相关脑电位研究"(批准号:30670717)
关键词 执行控制 任务切换 切换代价 任务设置 executive control, task switching, switch cost, task set.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Monsell S. Task switching, Trends in cognitive sciences, 2003, 7 (3): 134 - 140
  • 2史艺荃,周晓林.执行控制研究的重要范式——任务切换[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):672-679. 被引量:21
  • 3Rogers R D, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1995, 124(2): 207 -231
  • 4Meiran N. Reconfignration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(6): 1423 - 1442
  • 5Meiran N, Chorev Z, Sapir A. Component processes in task switching, Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 41 : 211 - 253
  • 6Altmann E M. The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32(1): 153 -163
  • 7Koch I. The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2003, 10:488 -492
  • 8Rubinstein J S, Meyer D E, Evans J E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 2001,27,763-797
  • 9Monsell S, Mizon G A. Can the task - cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task - set reconfiguration process? Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 2006, 32(3): 493 -516
  • 10Allprot D A, Styles E A, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umilta C, Moscovith M (Eds.), Attention and performance, XV, HiUsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994. 421 -452

二级参考文献12

  • 1Monsell S.Task switching.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7(3):134-140
  • 2Rogers R D,Monsell S.Costs of a Predictable Switch between Simple Cognitive Tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1995,124(2):207-231
  • 3Schneider D W,Logan G D.Modeling Task Switching Without Switching Tasks:A Short-Term Priming Account of Explicitly Cued Performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2005,134(3):343-367
  • 4Koch I.Sequential task predictability in task switching.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2005,12(1):107-112
  • 5Dreisbach G,Haider H,& Kluwe R H.Preparatory Processes in the Task-Switching Paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,2002,28(3):468-483
  • 6Miyake A,Emerson M J,Padilla F,& Jeung-chan A.Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals:the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.Acta Psychologica,2004,115:123-142
  • 7Taube-Schiff M,Segalowitz N.Linguistic Attention Control:Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2005,31(3):508-519
  • 8Logan G D.Working Memory,Task Switching,and Executive Control in the Task Span Procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2004,133(2):218-236
  • 9Meiran N.Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1996,22:1423-1442
  • 10Sohn M-H,Carlson R A.Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2000,26:1445-1460

共引文献23

同被引文献64

  • 1齐冰,白学军,沈德立.材料类型和任务可预测性在任务转换中的作用[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):41-44. 被引量:5
  • 2Arrington, C. M. , & Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compoundstimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory and Cognition ,32,965 - 978.
  • 3Barton,J. J. S. ,Kuzin,A. ,Polli,F. , Manoach, D.S. (2006). The use of working memory for task prediction: What benefits accrue from different types of foreknowledge? N, 139,385 - 392.
  • 4DeJong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch cost. In S. Monsell & J. Driver ( Eds. ) , Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes( pp. 357 - 376). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 5Dreisbach, G. , Haider, H. , & Kluwe, R. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,& Cognition,28,468 -483.
  • 6Hubner, M. , Dreisbaeh, G. , Haider, H. , & Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control : Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, & Cognition ,29,289 - 297.
  • 7Jersild,A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology ,89,5 - 82.
  • 8Logan, G. D. , & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance ,29,575 - 599.
  • 9Logan, G. D.,& Bundesenl C.(2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review ,11,832 - 840.
  • 10Logan, G. D. , & Schneider, D. W. (2006a). Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition ,34,1250-1259.

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部