摘要
认定事实是法院适用法律规范的逻辑前提。民事诉讼中有争议的事实既包括实体法上事实,也包括程序法上事实。学界对"疏明",即当事人对于程序法上事实的证明,这一研究课题的忽视导致司法界对于两者在对象和标准等问题上把握的失范。本文从疏明的概念出发,界定其与(实体法上事实)证明的区别,阐述其在民事诉讼中的重要程序功能和程序价值,并就疏明对象、疏明责任分配、疏明标准等相关问题进行探讨。
Only if the factual basis of the matter is clarified can the court determine the legal consequences. The party to the case who alleges to have a procedural right must prove the facts which allegedly form the basis for such right. But this problem is not well researched. This article tries to research into it.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期108-114,共7页
The Jurist
关键词
实体法事实
程序法事实
证明
疏明
the fact of the case
factual basis of the procedural right
the burden of proof
