期刊文献+

欧洲科学编辑学会关于影响因子不合理使用的声明 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
作者 刘雪立
出处 《眼科新进展》 CAS 2008年第9期652-652,共1页 Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
  • 相关文献

同被引文献16

  • 1Garfield E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool[J]. Scientometrics, 1979,(4) :359 -373.
  • 2Seglen P O. Why the impact factor of journals should not to be used for evaluating research[J]. BMJ, 1997, 314:497 -484.
  • 3Saha S, Saint S. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality[J]. J Maed Libr Assoc, 2003, (1) :42 -46.
  • 4Bollen J, Rodriguez M A, Van De Sompel H. Journal status[J], Scientometrics, 2006, (3) :669 -687.
  • 5Garfield E. Use of Journal Citation Reports and Journal Performance Indicators in measuring short and long term journal factor[ J ]. Croat Med J, 2000,41:366 -374.
  • 6Garfield E. How can impact factor be improved[J]. BMJ, 1996, 313:411 -413.
  • 7Editorial. Not - so - deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor[ J]. Nature, 2005, 435 : 1003 - 1004.
  • 8Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Show me the data[J]. JCB, 2007,(6) :1091 -1092.
  • 9Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. JAMA, 2006,(1) :90 -93.
  • 10Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a briefreview[J].CMAJ, 1999,(8) :979 -980.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部