期刊文献+

16S rRNA/DNA-PCR对初生新生儿肠道乳酸杆菌和大肠埃希菌的动态检测 被引量:10

Study on the variation of Lactobacillus and Escherichia coli in earlier newborn babies by fluorescent quantitative 16S rRNA/DNA targeted PCR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察新生儿生后肠道菌群的动态变化。方法采用16S rRNA/DNA荧光定量PCR技术,分别对40例足月儿和40例早产儿生后第1(>12h)、4、7天粪便标本中的乳酸杆菌和大肠埃希菌进行定量分析。结果不同日龄足月儿粪便标本中乳酸杆菌数量的对数值分别为5.50±0.81、6.87±0.81、9.20±0.87,早产儿分别为4.89±0.46、6.05±0.46、8.06±0.18;不同日龄足月儿粪便标本中大肠埃希菌数量的对数值分别为6.49±0.40、7.59±0.58、7.15±0.55,早产儿分别为6.32±0.51、7.39±0.78、7.05±0.63;2种细菌对数值分别在组间行单因素方差分析,差异有显著性(P<0.05);组内行配对t检验,差异也有显著性(P<0.05)。结论新生儿肠道菌群的建立是动态变化的,个体间差异受多因素影响,早产儿落后于足月儿。 Objective To observe the variation of intestinal flora in newborn babies. Methods The amount of stool Lactobacillus and Escherichia coli of first day, fourth day, seventh day after birth in 40 term and 40 preterm babies were measured by the practical fluorescent quantitative 16S rRNA/DNA-targeted PCR. Results Lactobacillus logarithmic abso- lute value of first day, fourth day, seventh day after birth were 5.50 ± 0.81,6.87 ± 0.81,9.20 ± 0.87 in term babies re- spectively, and 4.89 ± 0.46,6.05 ± 0.46,8.06 ±0.18 in preterm babies respectively. Escherichia coli logarithmic absolute value of first day, fourth day, seventh day after birth were 6.49 ± 0.40,7.59 ± 0.58,7.15 ± 0.55 in term babies respective- ly, and 6.32 ±0. 51 ,7.39± 0. 78,7.05 ± O. 63 in preterm babies respectively. The above values had statistical difference between group-to-group and within group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions There are developmental variation of intestinal flora formation in newborn babies. The intestinal bacterial flora formation of the preterm babies is slower than that of tenn.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第4期356-358,共3页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
基金 云南省中青年学术技术带头人后备人才培养计划资助项目(2006py01-18)
关键词 新生儿 肠道菌群 荧光定量 PCR Newborn Intestinal flora Fluorescent quantitative PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献53

  • 1王小卉,杨毅,王莹,于晓璐.婴儿肠道菌群的形成及其与食物过敏的关系[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2004,19(9):756-758. 被引量:24
  • 2方鹤松.小儿腹泻病治疗中的关键问题[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2005,20(3):193-195. 被引量:86
  • 3Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 1999,28(1) :19-25.
  • 4Langhendries JP, Paquay T, Hannon M, et al. Intestinal flora in the neonate: impact on morbidity and therapeutic perspectives[J].Arch Pediatr, 1998,5(6) :644-653.
  • 5Iakushenko MN, Tkhagapsoeva ZhA, Bondarenko VM. The Amben correction of disorders in the intestinal microbial colonization of newborn infants with perinatal pathology[J]. Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol, 1998, 1-2 (1):77-79.
  • 6Boehm G, Fanaro S, Jelinek J, et al. Prebiotic concept for infant nutrition[J]. Acta Paediatr Suppl, 2003,91(441): 64-67.
  • 7Liepke C, Adermann K, Raida M, et al. Human milk provides peptides highly stimulating the growth of bifidobacteria [J]. Eur J Biochem, 2002,269(2) :712-718.
  • 8Fanaro S, Chierici R, Guerrini P, et al. Intestinal microflora in early infancy: composition and development [J]. Acta Paediatr Suppl, 2003,91(441) :48-55.
  • 9Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease[J]. Lancet,2003,361:512-519.
  • 10Mountzouris KC, McCartney AL, Gibson GR. Intestinal microflora of human infants and current trends for its nutritional modulation[J]. Br J Nutr,2002,87:405-420.

共引文献101

同被引文献89

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部