期刊文献+

竞争性战略联盟中合作R&D效率的DEA分析 被引量:4

DEA analysis on the cooperative R&D efficiency of competitive strategic alliance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合作R&D是竞争对手间组建战略联盟的重要动机之一,因此对研发活动的效率进行测量与评价是分析此类联盟的重要内容,而评价方法的设计与选择也是研究的重点和难点。本文尝试将数据包络分析(DEA)方法引入到竞争性战略联盟的效率评价领域,应用多时段生产效率变化指数模型,分析了医药产业中竞争性联盟对R&D效率的影响,并评价了当前竞争性联盟中研发活动的效率水平。研究表明,与竞争对手合作开展R&D能够在较大程度上提高组织的总体研发效率,促进产业技术水平升级。本文研究结果对企业如何提升技术创新能力具有启发意义。 Cooperative R&D is one of the important motivation by which strategic alliances are formed between competitors. As a resuh, it is a meaningful task to measure and evaluate these R&D activities in such alliances. Furthermore, the designing and choosing evaluation methods is the focal point and difficult point of research. The efficiency evaluation of competitive strategic alliances is explored using Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) method, and the affection of such alliances on R&D efficiency in the medicine industry is compared using the Malmquist DEA modal. At last, the R&D efficiency level in the present competitive strategic alliances is estimated. Results show that the total research efficiency and industrial technological level can be improved to a. large extent through cooperation R&D with competitors. It has an instructive meaning to firms on how they can improve their technology innovation ability.
作者 龙勇 李薇
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期76-81,102,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:70672012)资助
关键词 竞争性战略联盟 合作R&D 效率 DEA competitive strategic alliance cooperative R&D efficiency DEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Colin C. H. , Huaning L. and Barry D. , The paradox of co -operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi - paradigm approach [ J]. Management Research News, 2003, 26(1) :1 -20.
  • 2Zineldin M. , Co - opetition: the organization of the future [J]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2004; 22(6/7): 780.
  • 3Dussauge P. , Garrette B. and Mitchell W. , Learning form competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 : 99 - 126.
  • 4Dagnino G. B. , Padula G. , Coopetiton Strategy: A New kind of interfirm Dynamics for Value Creation [R]. EURAM - The European Academy of Management Second Annual Conference "Innovative Research in Management", Stockholm, 2002.
  • 5Garcia R. , Atkin T. , Co - opetition for the diffusion of Resistant Innovations: A case study in the global wine industry. Northeastern University, Working paper [ EB/OL ] , No. :05 -002, 2005.
  • 6Quintana - Garc a C. , Benavides - Velasco C. A. , Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panal data of European dedicated biotechnology finns [ J ]. Technovation, 2004, 24 ( 12 ) :927 - 938.
  • 7陆金伟,达庆利,Sweha S.一种选择虚拟企业伙伴的框架[J].管理工程学报,2000,14(4):19-22. 被引量:20
  • 8佟泽华,韩春花,邵良杉,王松波.基于DEA法的虚拟企业合作伙伴效益评价应用研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2004,14(6):239-241. 被引量:3
  • 9Revilla E. , Sarkis J. and Modrego A. , Evaluating performance of public - private research collaborations : A DEA analysis [ J]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 2003,54 : 165 - 174.
  • 10Berg A. S. , F rsund R. F. and Jansen S. E. , Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980 -89 [J]. The Scandinavian journal of Economics, 1992, 94 : 211 - 228.

二级参考文献11

共引文献47

同被引文献103

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部