期刊文献+

具有序列投资的R&D联盟组织结构研究 被引量:1

Study on the R&D alliance governance structure with the sequential investment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究开发了两阶段序列投资道德风险模型。基于价格和成本这两个影响R&D项目价值的关键因素,建立道德风险模型,并比较专有权、共同所有权和期权合同(Option Contract)三种R&D联盟组织结构,分别讨论结盟的两公司的投资决策及其投资的相互依赖性,和关键的协议参数对两公司最优投资水平的影响。并证明了期权合同组织结构占优于其他所有权组织结构。从而对期权合同近年来使用越来越多的原因给出了理论解释。 A two -period moral hazard model with the sequential investment in the R&D alliance is studied. This moral hazard model is based on the price and cost that are two key factors affecting the R&D value. The governance structures in R&D alliance under exclusive or joint ownership and option contracts are analyzed and compared, the investment decisions of firm A and firm B, and the effect of key parameters on their first - best investment levels are discussed. Finally, it is proved that option contract strictly dominates other ownership structure. The results offer a theoretical explanation why partners in the R&D alliance frequently use contingent ownership structures to govern their relationship, and why their initial arrangement is often modified over the time.
作者 薛明皋 龚朴
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期82-88,118,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 R&D联盟的期权博弈理论评估模型及实证研究。批准编号:70671047 研究期限:2007年1月至2009年12月
关键词 R&D联盟 道德风险 专有权 共同所有权 期权合同 R&D alliance moral hazard exclusive ownership joint ownership option contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Bleeke J. and Ernst D. Is your strategic alliance really a sale [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, 1(2): 97 -106.
  • 2Su H. C. , Kensinger J. W. , Keown A. J, Martin J. D. Do strategic alliance create value [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, 46:199 -221.
  • 3Yoshino M. Y. and Rangan. Strategic alliance: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization [ M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Pree, 1995.
  • 4d' Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillover [J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 16, 1133-1137.
  • 5Suzumura, K. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in oligopoly with spillover [J]. American Economic Review, 1992, 82, 1307 - 1320.
  • 6Gersbach, H. and A. Schmutzler. Endogenous spillovers and labor contracts [J]. Journal of Management Strategy, 2003a, 12, 179 - 206.
  • 7易余胤,肖条军,盛昭瀚.合作研发中机会主义行为的演化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(4):80-87. 被引量:106
  • 8Arora,A. and A. Gambardella. Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies olarge firms in biotechnology[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1990, 38, 361 - 379.
  • 9Dasgupta,S. and Z. Tao. Contractual incompleteness and the optimality of equity joint ventures [ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1998, 37,391 - 413.
  • 10Demski,J. S and D. E. M,Sappington. Resolving double moral hazard problems with buyout arrangement[ J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1991, 22,232 -240.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Beatb J, Poyage J A, Ulph D. Organization design and information-sharing in a research joint venture with spillovers[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research, 1998, 50: 47-59.
  • 2Petit M L, Tolwinski B. R&D cooperation or competition[J]. European Economic Review, 1998, 43: 185-208.
  • 3Rajiv Sethi, Somanathan E. Understanding reciprocity[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2003, 50: 1-27.
  • 4Ananish Chaudhuri, Barry Sopher, Paul Strand. Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust and reciprocity[ J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2002, 23: 231-249.
  • 5Guttman J M. On the evo lutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 16:31-50.
  • 6Anderhub V, Engelmann D, Guth W. An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2002, 48: 197-216.
  • 7Pierre Picard. Auditing claims in the insurance market with fraud: The credibility issue[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996,63: 27-56.
  • 8Cressman R. The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory: A Dynamic Approach[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag,1992. 14-17.
  • 9肖条军,盛昭瀚,陶向京.企业集团技术创新中非技术因素的影响与对策[J].科研管理,2000,21(3):11-17. 被引量:28
  • 10罗炜,唐元虎.合作创新的经济学分析[J].预测,2001,20(2):8-11. 被引量:13

共引文献105

同被引文献24

  • 1陈晓莲,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.321-322.
  • 2WILLIAMSON O,GHANI T.Transaction cost economics and its uses in marketing[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2012,40(1):74-85.
  • 3WILLIAMSON O E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M].New York:Free Press,1985:185-202.
  • 4WILLIAMSON O E.Comparative economic organization:The analysis of discrete structural.altematives[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):269-296.
  • 5GULBRANDSEN B,SANDVIK K,HAUGLAND S A.Antecedents of vertical integration:Transaction cost economics and resource-based explanations[J].Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,2009,15(2):89-102.
  • 6YANG C,WACKER J G,SHEU C.What makes outsourcing effective?A transaction-cost economics analysis[J].International Journal of Production Research,2012,50(16):4462-4476.
  • 7LIN H M,HUANG H C,LIN C P,ET AL.How to manage strategic alliances in OEM-based industrial clusters:Network embeddedness and formal governance mechanisms[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2012,41(3):449-459.
  • 8NICHOLSON J,TSAGDIS D,BRENNAN R.The structuration of relational space:Implications for firm and regional eompetitiveness[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2013,42(3):372-381.
  • 9KLEIN P G.The make-or-buy decisions:Lessons from empirical studies[M]//Handbook of new institutional economics.Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2008:435-464.
  • 10LEIBLEIN M J,REUER J J,DALSACE F.Do make or buy decisions matter?The influence of organizational governance on technological performance[J].Strategic management journal,2002,23(9):817-833.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部