期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

同而不和:群体决策中的阿背伦悖论 被引量：1

"Tong Er Bu He":Abilene Paradox in Group Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统回顾并评价了阿背伦悖论的研究现状,发现导致阿背伦悖论研究薄弱的主要原因。基于此,对阿背伦悖论的内涵重新界定(同而不和),并在明晰群体思维分类的基础上得出,阿背伦悖论是群体思维现象(同而和、同而不和)中的一种。阿背伦悖论虽只是群体思维的一种类型,其研究依然颇具理论与现实意义。 Abilene Paradox, similar with groupthink, is dysfunctional Phenomenon of group consensus decision-making. Scholars have paid more attention to groupthink research during the past thirty years. This paper reviews the research on Abilene Paradox, suggests the reasons why Abilene Paradox has been neglected. Then we define Abilene Paradox, category groupthink to groupthink I and groupthink Ⅱ, and confirm that Abilene Paradox is groupthink Ⅱ. Meanings and directions of Abilene Paradox research are given.
作者 赵慧群 陈国权
机构地区 清华大学经济管理学院
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第9期35-40,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家杰出青年基金项目"中国企业领导个人学习 团队学习和组织学习的理论与实证研究"(70625003) 国家自然科学基金项目(70272007 70572005 70321001) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(06JJD630013)
关键词 阿背伦悖论 群体思维 一致性危机 Abilene paradox groupthink crisis of agreement
分类号 C934 [经济管理—管理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Harvey, J. B. The Abilene Paradox: the management of agreement [J]. Organizational Dynamics,1974(Summer):63-80
  • 2Janis, I. L. Victims of Group Think: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decision and Fiascoes[M].Boston- Houghton Mifflin, 1972
  • 3毕鹏程,席酉民,王益谊.群体思维理论的发展及其实证研究综述[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(4):75-84. 被引量：15
  • 4Taras, D. G.. Breaking The silence: differentiating crises of agreement [J]. Public Administration Quarterly,1991(winter): 401-418
  • 5Kim, Y. A comparative study of the "Abilene Paradox" and "Groupthink" [J]. Public Administration Quarterly.2001,25(2): 168-189
  • 6Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEOPI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual, Odessa, FL: PAR, 1992
  • 7Harvey, M., Novicevi, M. M., Buckley, M.R. et al. The Abilene Paradox after thirty years: a global perspective[J].Organizational Dynamics, 2004, 33(2): 215-226
  • 8Kanter, R. M. An Abilene defense: commentary one [J].Organizational Dynamics, 1988(Summer): 37-40
  • 9Golembiewski, R.T. Ironies in Organization Development [M]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1990
  • 10Raven, B. H., Raven, J. Z. The Nixon group [J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1974(30): 297-320

二级参考文献40

  • 1Park W. A review of research on groupthink[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 1990, (3): 229-245.
  • 2't Hart P, Irving L. Janis' victims of groupthink[J]. Political Psychology, 1991, 12: 247-278.
  • 3Street M D. Groupthink[J]. Small Group Research, 1997, 28(1): 72-93.
  • 4Moorhead G, Neck C P, West M S. The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink for the twenty-first century[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1998, 73(2/3): 327-351.
  • 5Peterson R S, Owen P D, Tetlock P E, et al. Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success [J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1998, 73 (2/3): 272-305.
  • 6Janis I L. Groupthink[J]. Psychology Today, 1971, (November): 4-46, 74-76.
  • 7Turner M E, Pratkanis A R. Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1998, 73(2/3): 105-115.
  • 8Janis I L. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decision and Fiascoes[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,1972.
  • 9Tetlock P E. Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37: 1314-1324.
  • 10Longley J, Pruitt D G. Groupthink: A critique of Janis' s theory[A]. In: Wheeler L. Ed. Review of Personality and Social Psychology[C]. Sage, CA: Beverly Hills, 1980. 507-513.

共引文献14

同被引文献13

  • 1王渊.国内外关于群体凝聚力研究的综述及发展[J].淮北职业技术学院学报,2004,3(4):68-70. 被引量：10
  • 2刘敬孝,杨晓莹,连铃丽.国外群体凝聚力研究评介[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(3):45-51. 被引量：51
  • 3ROBERGE M E, DICK R V. Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? [J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2010,20(4):295-308.
  • 4LAURIOLA M, LEVIN I P. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study [J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001,31(2) :215-226.
  • 5斯蒂芬.P.罗宾斯.组织行为学(7版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:257.
  • 6ZACCARO S J, MCCOY M C. The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 18(10) :837-851.
  • 7MULLEN B, ANTHONY T, SALAS E,et al. Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making [J]. Small Group Research, 1994,25(2) : 189-204.
  • 8CARRON A V, WIDMIYER W N, BRAWLEY L R. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport team: the group environment questionnaire [J]. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1985(7) :244-265.
  • 9JAMES L R. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982,67 (2) :219-229.
  • 10谢科范,陈刚,郭伟.创业团队风险决策共享心智模型研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2010,32(3):142-146. 被引量：4

引证文献1

科学学与科学技术管理
2008年 第9期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部