浅析民事时效的立法目的

Elementary discussion on legislative purpose of civil prescription

取得时效与消灭时效作为民事时效制度之"两翼",它们在适用对象、事实状态、制度起源、法律后果等方面都有一定差异。但它们又毕竟是可以统一于"时效"这一上位概念之下的"两翼",在很多方面具有相似性。取得时效与消灭时效的区别使它们在主要立法目的和直接立法目的上表现出较大的差异性,而两者的相似之处又使其最终立法目的和次要立法目的体现出明显的一致性,这种一致性既可能是制度适用的直接追求,也可能是它们效力"反射"后的"交汇"效应。

As the ＂two wings＂ of civil prescription, there are some difference between acquisitive prescription and extinctive prescription in the aspects of applicative objects, fact states, system origin and legal result. Yet, they share many common aspects due to the fact of being the ＂two wings＂ under the higherrank concept of ＂prescription＂. The differences make the two systems show some dispute on direct and main legislative goals, and the similarities also make them show some consistency in final and subsidiary legislative goals. This kind of consistency may be the direct pursuit of prescription system application, or the ＂combination result＂ from the ＂effect reflection＂ of the two systems.