摘要
目的探讨不同方法治疗颞部凹陷的优缺点。方法采用自体脂肪充填和生物材料充填治疗颞部凹陷,对两种方法进行比较。结果自体脂肪充填法,取材简单、费用低廉、手术操作方便安全,且术后外形饱满,手感柔软,较易为患者接受。但有部分患者因脂肪吸收而需再次充填;生物材料充填法,来源广泛,可以一次成型,但费用较高,术后手感较硬,并且存在着一定的排异反应可能。结论自体脂肪充填法是目前较好的,且易被患者接受的治疗颞部凹陷的手术方法;而生物材料充填法,应提醒患者在术前慎重考虑。
Objective To determine which method of temporal filling is more acceptable autograft of fat granulae or filling of biomaterial. Methods The two methods were compared in material preparation, procedure, result of appearance and sense of touch, safety and cost. Results Autograft of fat granulae is simpler, safer, cheaper, with good appearance and soft sense of touch. The shortcoming is possibility of second injection because of fat granulae absorption. Filling of biomaterial can achieve in one time of operation and is easy in material preparation. But it costs much more,gets a hard touching,and is in danger of exclusion. Conclusion Autograft of fat granulae far temporal filling is more acceptant comparing to biomaterial filling.
出处
《组织工程与重建外科杂志》
2008年第4期225-226,共2页
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词
颞部凹陷
自体脂肪
生物材料
Temporal filling
Autograft of fat
Biomaterial
