范注“文术论”之称今辩

Debating on Fan Wenlan's Annotation of Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature: An Interpretation

提出并解决《文心雕龙》下篇的"命名"问题,既有助于认清《文心雕龙》整体体系,更有利于理解《文心雕龙》下篇的内涵和性质。对范注"文术论"之称及其统括的理论范围的辨析,可以得出结论,范文澜在《文心雕龙注》中把《文心雕龙》下篇统称为"文术论",更符合《文心雕龙》的本旨和原貌,对理解《文心雕龙》下篇的性质和范围具有积极意义。

The essay proposes the ＂Naming＂ of the lower canto of Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature： An Interpretation, and it will help us understand the whole system of Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature ： An Interpretation and to understand the connotation and nature of the lower canto of the book. It agrees that Fan Wenlan＇ s remarks of ＂the methods of the article in writing＂ on the lower canto conforms to the essence and original appearance of Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature ： An Interpretation and makes great contribution to understanding the nature and range of the lower canto of Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature ： An Interpretation.