期刊文献+

自由主义、共和主义财产权比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Property Rights of Liberalism and Republicanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 财产权是自由主义与共和主义共享的价值理念。两者都强调政府对财产权的保护。两者的区别体现在:自由主义以财产权保护为政府的根本目的,视财产权为个人权利的核心;共和主义以公共利益为政府存在的根本目的,对财产权的保护关键在于财产和人们的公民美德具有同一性。美国宪法共和主义发现了公民美德的脆弱性与公共权力的扩张性,主张以更加制度化的财产法确定人们的财产权,同时强调财产的责任,从而走向个人与集体利益的平衡。 Property rights are the notion shared by liberalism and republicanism. Both of them put emphasis on the protection of property rights. There are key differences between liberalism and republicanism. Liberalism regards the protection of property rights as the only goal of the government, since the people with liberal views regard property rights as the core of individual rights. Republicanism regards public benefits as the fundamental aim of the government. The reason for protecting property rights of republicanism is that republicanism regards property rights as civic virtue. Republicanism in the United States Constitution affirms a system of property laws to confirm property rights when they found the frangibility of civic virtue and selfdilation of power. Republicanism in the United States Constitution pays attention to the responsibility for property, which aims at the balance between collective interest and individual one.
作者 万绍红
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第4期7-11,共5页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 自由主义 共和主义 财产权 美国宪法 liberalism republicanism property rights United States Constitution
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[2]J·Ehrenberg.Civil Society,New York Univ.Press,1999,pp.23-25.
  • 2[美]乔治·霍兰·萨拜因 刘山 译.政治学说史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986..
  • 3[5]Agrippa letter XII,in The essential antifederalist,edited by W.B.Allen and Gordon Lloyd,associate editor,Margie Lloyd,Lanham,MD:Rowman & Littlefield,2002,p.266.
  • 4[6]Caroline Robbins.The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthmen,Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1959.
  • 5[7]Bernard Bailyn.Ideological Origins of the American Revolution,Cambridge:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1967.
  • 6[8]Thought on Government,in The political writings of John Ad-ams,edited with an introduction by George W.Carey.Washington,D.C.:Regnery Pub.; Lanham,MD:Distributed to the trade by Nation-al Book Network,2000,pp.488-489.
  • 7[美]列奥·施特劳斯 申彤译.霍布斯的政治哲学[M].南京:译林出版社,2001..
  • 8[13]Cato letter VI 16 December 1787,in The essential antifederal-ist,edited by W.B.Allen and Gordon Lloyd,associate editor,Margie Lloyd,Lanham,MD:Rowman & Littlefield,2002,pp2.57 -259.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部