期刊文献+

光照与黑暗对大豆锈病菌侵染影响的研究 被引量:3

Effect of light intensity on infection of soybean rust
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大豆锈病(Phakopsora pachyrhixi Syd.)主要以其夏孢子进行传播和侵染。应用大豆离体叶片培养技术,在24±1℃、相对湿度饱和的人工控制条件下,研究光照强度和黑暗时长对大豆锈病菌夏孢子侵染的影响。结果表明,黑暗培养8~16h,光强在600~400lx适宜大豆锈病菌夏孢子的侵染,延长或缩短黑暗培养时长,大豆锈病菌的侵染逐渐减少,增加或降低光强度,大豆锈病菌夏孢子的侵染率也逐渐降低,高光强(〉3000lx)和低光强(〈200lx)均不利于大豆锈病菌夏孢子的侵染,从高光强或低光强转至适宜光强度下均有利于大豆锈病菌夏孢子的侵染;试验结果与田间大豆锈病自然发生规律相似。 Soybean rust(Phakopsora pachyhizi Syd. ) mainly infects and spread in urediospores form mostly. In order to confirm the effect oflight intensity and dark incubation period on the infection of soybean rust urediospores,we made the experiments using the detached leaf culture technique under the temperature 24±1℃ and saturated relative humidity in controlled condition. The results showed the dark incubation period of 8- 16 h and light intensity of 600 - 400 lx was favorable for the infection of soybean rust urediospores. The infection of soybeanrust reduced gradually with extend or shorten dark incubation period. The infection rate of the urodiosperes also decreased gradually with thelight intensity increasin or decreasing. Higher light intensity( 〉3000 lx) or lower light intensity ( 〈200 lx) was disadvantage for the infection of the urediospors and it was advantage for the infection of the urediospores with the light intensity changing to the favorable light intensity from the higher or lower light intensity. The results exhibited similarity to the natural happening of the soybean rust in the field.
出处 《西南农业学报》 CSCD 2008年第4期997-1001,共5页 Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金项目(30328018)
关键词 大豆锈病(Phakopsora pachyrhixi Syd.) 夏孢子 光照强度 黑暗时长 soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhixi Syd. ) urediospores light intensity dark incubation period
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1庄剑云.中国大豆锈病的病原、寄主及分布[J].中国油料,1991(3):67-69. 被引量:10
  • 2章桂明,葛永怡.大豆锈病风险分析[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,2006,19(1):5-8. 被引量:4
  • 3Yang C Y . Soybean rust causod by Phnkopsorn nchyrhizi[C]. Presented at the first soybean rest workshop (held in China) ,1991.29.
  • 4谈宇俊.大豆锈病研究进展[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1994.1-21,50-59,149-157.
  • 5孙永亮.大豆锈病研究的新进展[J].大豆科学,1992,11(3):253-258. 被引量:4
  • 6莫贱友,黄富宁,朱桂宁,黄莲江,孙恢鸿.广西大豆锈病菌生理小种研究初报[J].广西农业科学,1997(5):239-241. 被引量:4
  • 7莫贱友,朱桂宁,黄莲江,孙恢鸿.大豆锈病药剂防治试验[J].广西农业科学,1994,26(1):21-23. 被引量:1
  • 8Yorinori . Country report and rust control strategies in Brazil [ C ]. Presented at the World soybean Rescareh Conference IV International soybean Processing and Utilization ( held in Brazil ) , 2004. 447 - 456.
  • 9Kuchller F, Duffy M, Shrum R D, et al. Potential economic consequences of the entry of an exotic fungal pest: The Cause of Soybean Rust [ J]. Phytopathology, 1984,74 (8) :916 - 920.
  • 10谈宇俊 余子林 等.大豆锈病流行规律及防治的研究[J].中国油料,1982,(4):1-8.

二级参考文献39

  • 1谈宇俊,孙永亮.大豆锈病病菌生理小种的初步研究[J].大豆科学,1989,8(1):71-74. 被引量:7
  • 2谈宇俊,孙永亮.大豆锈病的鉴定技术[J].中国油料,1989(1):65-67. 被引量:10
  • 3张潘湘.防治大豆锈病的初步研究[J].石城科技,1978,(1):40-46.
  • 4黄齐望.江西省经济植物志[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,1978..
  • 5中华人民共和国农业部科技司 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所.大豆锈病研究进展[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1994..
  • 6USDA.Soybean rust information site[EB/OL].[2005-09-28].http://www.sbrusa.net.
  • 7SINCLAIR J B,HARTMAN G L.Soybean rust[M]//Compendium of soybean disease.APS Press,1999.
  • 8KUCHLER F,DUFFY M,SHRUM R D,etal.Potential economic consequences of the entry of an exotic fungal pest:The Cause of Soybean Rust[J].Phytopathology,1984,74 (8):916-920.
  • 9BROMFIELD K R.Soybean rust[M]//Monograph No 11.The American Phytopathological Society,St.Paul,MN.1984.
  • 10ONO Y,BURITICA,HENNEN J F.Delimitation of Phakopsora,Physopella and Cerotelium and their species on Leguminosae[J].Mycological Research,1992,96:825-850.

共引文献24

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部