期刊文献+

基于性能抗震设计方法与基于承载力抗震设计方法比较研究 被引量:13

Comparitive Study on Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Bearing Capacity-Based Design Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过研究基于性能抗震设计方法与传统基于承载力抗震设计方法的区别,指出基于承载力抗震设计方法可能存在的问题以及性能设计方法的解决之道,同时分析指出承载力并不是影响消能减震结构的最主要因素,结构的模态位移、顶点最大位移及延性与减震结构的等效阻尼比密切相关,位移设计方法是比传统基于承载力抗震设计方法更加适合于消能减震结构的设计方法,最后指出基于位移设计方法存在的问题和未来发展方向。 By comparing the performance-based seismic design method (PBSD) and bearing capacity-based design method (BCBD) , it is concluded that PBSD could obtain better results than BCBD. In the design of the energy dissipation structures (EDS), force-carrying capacity is not the controlling factor while structural modal displacement, maximum roof displacement and ductility have more influence on the equivalent damping ratio of the EDS. Displacement-based seismic design method (DBSD) is thus a more efficient method in the analysis of passive energy dissipation structures. The existing problems and future research directions of DBSD are put forward at the end of the paper
作者 蒋建
出处 《结构工程师》 2008年第4期52-57,共6页 Structural Engineers
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50708071) 973计划项目(2007CB714202)
关键词 性能设计方法 承载力设计方法 位移设计方法 消能减震结构 performance-based seismic design method, bearing capacity-based design method, displacement- based seismic design method, passive energy dissipation structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Ronald Hamburger, Chris Rojahn,Jack Moethle, et al. The ATC-58 Project : Development of Next-Generation Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Design Criteria for Buildings [ C]. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B. C. , Canada, 2004 : 1819.
  • 2Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ R]. FEMA- 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997, Washington, D. C.
  • 3Seleemah A A, Constantinou M C. Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. Rep. No. NCEER-97-0004 [ R ]. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo,Buffalo, N. Y.
  • 4Ramirez O M,Constantinou M C, Gomez J D, et al. Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis of yielding structures with damping systems [ J ]. Earthquake Spectra, August 2002,18 ( 3 ) : 501-530.
  • 5Priestley M J N. Displacement-Based Approaches to Rational Limit States Design of New Structures [ C ]. 1998, Keynote Address in the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France.
  • 6Medhekar M S, Kennedy D T L. Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Building-Theory [ J ]. Engineering Structures ,2000,22:201-209.
  • 7Lin Y Y, Tsai M H, Hwang J S, et al. Direct displacement-based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems [ J ]. Engineering Structures ,2003, (25) :25-37.
  • 8Fajfar P, Krawinkler Helmut. Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes [ C ]// proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Bled, Slovenia, June, 1997.
  • 9Miranda E, Ruiz-Gareia J. Evaluation of approximate method to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics ,2002,31 (3) :539-560.
  • 10Bommer J J, Elnashai A S. Displacement spectra for seismic design [ J ]. Journal of earthquake engineering, 1999, (3) :1-32.

二级参考文献10

共引文献112

同被引文献82

引证文献13

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部