对抗制·羁押率·简易程序适用率——刑事诉讼法再修改研究中的流行误区剖析

Adversarial System,Custody Rate and Application Rate of Summary Procedures——An Analysis of the Mistaken Ideas in the Revision of Criminal Procedure Law

在刑事诉讼法再修改研究过程中,理论界和实务界普遍主张我国应当借鉴对抗制诉讼模式,降低羁押率,扩大简易程序适用范围。对抗制以发达的律师辩护制度为存在前提,以对抗性的文化为支撑。我国不具备实行对抗制诉讼模式的制度基础和文化条件,因而增强职权因素,强调公、检、法机关的客观义务,可能是更好的选择。同样,我国也不具备降低羁押率、扩大简易程序适用范围的条件,所以缩短羁押期限、减少办案环节才是我国提高诉讼效率的基本途径。

During the research of the revision of Criminal Procedure Law, it is argued both in the theoretical and practical world that adversarial proceeding should be used, custody rate should be decreased and summary procedures should be widely applied. Adversarial system is based on advanced counsel defense system and braced by adversarial culture, both of which do not exist in China. Therefore, the author believes that adversarial system should not be used in China and it is the obligation of the public security organ, the procuratorate and the court to find the truth of the cases. Similarly, time of custody should be shortened and procedures should be summarized in order to boost the efficiency of proceeding.