摘要
留置权的消灭原因有其自身的特殊性:标的物在实物形态上的灭失不必然导致留置权的消灭;混同可以作为留置权的消灭原因,但在留置权与质权或抵押权混同时只有在它们所担保债务同一时方发生留置权消灭的效果;留置权可基于主债权诉讼时效的届满而丧失"胜诉权";占有的一时丧失并不能导致留置权的消灭;相当"人保"而非"物保"的提出须以债权人接受为必要而消灭留置权;债权清偿期的延缓不能作为留置权的消灭原因。
the reasons for the elimination of lien has its own characteristics: the object matter in the form of physical loss does not certainly lead to the eradication of lien ; if lien and other rights set on the same object, the lien will be eliminated, but if the right mixed with lien is mortgage or pledge, only when they secure the same debt, lien will be eliminated ; the court will not protect the lien for the expiry of the secured claimg limitations of action ; the temporary loss of possession can not lead to the eradication of lien; Considerable guarantee rather than security interests accepted by creditors is necessary for the eradication of lien; delaying the debt repayment period should not be used as the reasons for the elimination of lien.
出处
《山东警察学院学报》
2008年第3期31-35,共5页
Journal of Shandong Police College
关键词
留置权
担保物权
消灭原因
占有
lien
security interests
reasons for elimination
possession