1Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartzet J E,et al. Patient non - compli- ance with paper diaries[ J] BMJ, 2002,324 : 1193 - 1194.
2RHufford M, Stone AA, Shiffman S,et al. Paper vs. electronic dia- ries: compliance and subject evaluations [ J ]. Appl Clinl Trials, 2002,24:38 - 43.
3Haller G, Hailer DM, Courvoisier DS, et al. Handheld vs. laptopcomputers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a cross- over randomized trial [ J 1. J Am Med Informat Ass,2009, 16 : 651 - 659. Lauritsena K, Degl' Innocentib A, Hendel L,et al. Symptom record- ing in a randomized clinical trial :.
4Lauritsena K, Degl' Innocentib A, Hendel L,et al. Symptom record- ing in a randomized clinical trial : paper diaries vs. electronic or tele- phone data capture [ J ]. Controlled Clin Tr/a/s, 2004, 25 : 585 - 597.
5Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry, Patient - Re- portedOuteome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to SupportLabeling Claims, December 2009. http://www, fda. gov/ downloads/Drugs/Guidanees/UCM 193282. pdf, 2012 - 10 - 08.
6Bergstrom F, McGinley D, Ackerman S, et al. Global industry use of electronic patient - reported outcome instruments : Preliminary re- sults from a 2010 EPRO survey[ J]. Value Health, 2010,13 : 337.
7Gwaltney C J, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper- and - pencil administration of patient - reported outcome measures:A meta- analytic review [ J ]. Value in Health, 2008,11 : 322 - 333.
8Weiler K, Christ AM, Woodworth GC,, et al. Quality of patient re- ported outcome data captured using paper and interactive voice re- sponse diaries in an allergic rhinitis study; is electronic data capture really better [ J ] Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol , 2004,113 : 78.
9Meltzer EO, Kelley N, Hovell MF. Randomized cross - over evalu- ation of mobile phone vs paper diary in subjects with mild to moder- ate persistent asthma [ J]. Open Respir Med J, 2008, 2 : 72 -79.
