文化智力量表在我国大学生中的结构效度

Construct Validity of Cultural Intelligence Questionnaire in Chinese College Students

目的:考察在中国文化背景下,文化智力(CI)的结构是否符合四因素模型以及文化智力是否可与情绪智力(EQ)区分。方法:采用问卷调查法,通过使用往返翻译出的EQ、CI问卷中文版对351名在校中国大学生进行施测,并对结果进行了相关分析、探索性和验证性因素分析。结果:文化智力中文版各维度的α系数在0.86-0.93之间。探索性因素分析得出与原有模型一致的四个因素元认知、认知、动机、行为,共可解释67.35%的变异,因素负荷范围为0.49-0.85。验证性因素分析验证了四因素模型具有最优拟合度,CFI、IFI、NFI均大于0.95,RMSEA=0.09。两个问卷36个项目的探索性和验证性因素分析得出与CI、EQ对应的2因素模型为最佳模型(GFI、NFI、CFI均大于0.90,RMSEA=0.08)。结论:文化智力四因素模型具有跨文化的一致性;文化智力与情绪智力是相关却独立的心理特征;初步证明了文化智力中文问卷的构思效度。

Objective： To examine whether the Cultural Intelligence （CI） structure accords with four-factor CI model and whether there is difference between structures of CI and Emotional Intelligence （ EQ ） . Methods： Questionnaire survey was used and 351 college students were assessed with the Chinese version of EQ questionnaire and CI questionnaire. Then correlation analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. Results： The reliability coefficients of CI ranged from 0. 86 to 0. 93. Exploratory Factor Analysis showed CI Chinese version had four factors （ which could explain 67. 35% variance and the load of factors varied from 0. 49 to 0. 85 ） . Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that four-factor model of CI was the most suitable model （ CFI, IFI, NFI 〉 0. 95 ; RMSEA = 0. 09 ） . The same analysis measurements on 36 items of CI and EQ supported two-factor model, which proved they were structurally independent （ GFI, NFI, CFI 〉 0. 90 ; RMSEA = 0. 08 ） . Conclusion： Four-factor CI model has been proved cultural free in China. CI and EQ are related but independent concepts. The construct validity of cultural intelligence has been proved.