期刊文献+

Rosenberg自尊量表中文版条目8的处理 被引量:107

Disposal to the 8th Item of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale(Chinese Version)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:修订Rosenberg自尊量表中文版条目8。方法:162名大三学生参与了包含条目8三种不同中文表述(正向表述、委婉表述、否定表述)的一个12条目量表的测试,对由条目8不同表述所组成的10条目量表进行了因素分析和信度检验,并比较了条目8与总分的相关。结果:条目8与量表总分的相关分别是:正向表述0.05,委婉表述0.32,否定表述0.81;条目8以委婉、否定语气表述,则量表均抽取2个因子,其在各自量表中所能解释的方差变异分别是0.26、0.64,条目8以正向表述,则单独成为第3因子;正向表述、委婉语气表述、否定语气表述所组成的量表的内部一致性信度分别是0.82、0.83、0.88。结论:将条目8用明确的否定语气进行中文表述要比另外两种表述更合适些。 Objective: To revise the 8th item of Rosenberg Serf-Esteem Scale ( Chinese Version) . Methods: The 8th item was translated in 3 different Chinese expressions, i. e. positive expression, neutral expression, and negative expression. These expressions were put in a scale together with other 9 items, and 162 college students completed the scale. Discriminability of 3 different expressions of the 8th item was compared. Factor analysis was used to extract the factors of a ten items scale included one of 3 different expressions. Reliability of 3 scales included one of the 8th item expressions were also examined. Results: The correlations between the scores of positive expression, neutral expression, negative expression of the 8th item and total score of the scale were 0. 05, 0. 32 and 0. 81, and 2 factors were extracted in scales composed by neutral and negative expressions, while 3 factors in positive expression. Respectively, Cronbachg Alphas of 3 different expressions scales were 0. 82, 0. 83, and 0. 88. Conclusion: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Chinese Version) with a negative Chinese expression of the 8th item seems to be more reliable.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期661-663,共3页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 自尊量表 条目修订 区分度 信度 心理测量学研究 self-esteem scale item revising diseriminability reliability psychometric study
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1周丹霞,俞爱月,王国松,赵红红,童军峰,岳世英,陶宇峰,竺科英.大、中学生焦虑、抑郁、自尊水平测值比较及相关性研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2005,13(2):88-89. 被引量:38
  • 2张向葵,田录梅.自尊对失败后抑郁、焦虑反应的缓冲效应[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):240-245. 被引量:88
  • 3汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 4汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.134-142,161-167.
  • 5[2]Sarason,B.R.,Sarason,I.G.,&Pierce,G.R.Social support:an interactional view,1990.New Yourk:John Wiley & Sons.
  • 6[3]Krause,N.,& Shaw,B.A.giving social support to others,socioeconmic status and changes in self-esteem in late life.The journals of gerontology,2000,55(6):323-333.
  • 7[4]Antonucci T.C.Social relations:an examination of social networks,social support,and sense of control.In J.Birren,& K.Schaie(eds.),handbook of the psychology of aging(5th)(pp.427-453).San Diego:academic press.
  • 8[5]Krause,N.Assessing change in social support during late life,research on aging,1999,21(4):539-569.
  • 9[6]Van Tilburg,T.,gierveld,J.,Lecchini,L.,& Marsiglia,D.Social integration and loneliness:a comparativs study among older adults in the Netherlands and Tuscany,Italy.Journal of social and personal relationship,1998,15:740-754.
  • 10张日昇.青年心理学:中日青年心理的比较研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1993.176.

共引文献480

同被引文献1287

引证文献107

二级引证文献782

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部