期刊文献+

基于功能的英汉语情态隐喻对比研究 被引量:31

Metaphors of modality in English and Chinese:A contrastive study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从情态隐喻句式的非一致式、英语情态动词与汉语能愿动词、名词化与及物过程的转换、情态隐喻与情态的主客观取向系统、情态的三级量值等几个方面进行英汉语情态隐喻对比研究,以便为汉语情态研究提供一种新视角。从形式上讲,英语和汉语都有情态句法的非一致形式,但英语更多采用形合手段,因而更为清晰;汉语更多采用词汇意合手段,因而较为模糊。从功能上讲,英汉语都有情态隐喻用法的情况。 This paper constitutes an attempt to provide a new perspective for studying Chinese modality.A contrastive study is conducted of metaphors of modality between English and Chinese in terms of syntactic variations,nominalization and transitivity alternations,subjective and objective preferences of modality.Research shows that both English and Chinese have incongruent forms of modality.The incongruent forms of modality in English usually exist in the hypotactic clauses,whereas the Chinese counterparts normally appear in the paratactic clauses.From the function point of view,there exists the same phenomenon that form,meaning and function of metaphors of modality are not equivalent in either language.
作者 魏在江
机构地区 西安外国语大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期263-272,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 陕西省哲学社会科学规划项目"英汉语法隐喻对比研究"(批准号:05J007Z)的部分成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad & E. Finegsan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [ M ]. London : Pearson Education Limited.
  • 2Bussmann, H. 2000. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics [ Z]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 3Halliday, M. A. K. 1985/1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold.
  • 4Halliday, M. A. K. & M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London : Arnold Publishers.
  • 5Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Compony.
  • 6Palmer, F. R. 2001. Modalits' and the English Verbs [M]. London: Longman.
  • 7Papafragou, A. 2000, Modality: Issues in the Semantics Pragmatics Interface [ M ]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • 8Simon-Vandenbergen, A. -M., M. Taverniers &L. Ravelli (eds.). 2003. Grammatical Metaphor [C]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 9Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Taverniers, M. 2003. Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A historiography of the introduction and initial study of the concept [A]. In A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (eds.). Grammatical Metaphor [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 5-33.

二级参考文献44

共引文献246

同被引文献449

引证文献31

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部