期刊文献+

嗓音声学分析和电声门图在声带息肉手术疗效评估中的应用 被引量:9

Application of Voice Acoustic Analysis and Electroglottography in Polypectomy of Vocal Cords
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨嗓音声学分析和电声门图(ECG)在声带息肉患者手术疗效评估中的作用。方法:采用Dr.Speech软件,对30例声带息肉患者手术前及手术后1周、2周进行嗓音声学分析和电声门图检测,并与50例正常人对照。结果:声带息肉组比正常对照组有较高的基频微扰(Jitter)、振幅微扰(Shimmer)、噪声能量(NNE)和较低的谐噪比(HNR)、信噪比(SNR),各指标的差异均有统计学意义;声带息肉术后1周、2周和术前比较,jitter、shim-mer和NNE均下降,HNR和SNR升高,其中术后第2周与术前比较,各参数值差异均有统计学意义。结论:嗓音声学分析与电声门图检测可客观、定量地分析嗓音质量,评估手术疗效。 Objective. To evaluate the use of voice acoustic analysis and electroglottography in laryngeal polyps surgery. Methods. The software of Dr. Speech was used to do acoustic and ECG test for 30 patients with vocal cord polyps before the operation, one week and two weeks after the operation. And those of 50 normal subjects were also analyzed as the controls. Results: The jitter, shimmer and NNE parameters were higher and HNR, SNR parameters were lower significantly in vocal cord polyps than in normal controis (all P〈0. 01). The jitter, shimmer and NNE decreased and HNR, SNR increased one week and two weeks after the operation in vocal cord polyps. All the parameters were different significantly between preoperation and two weeks postoperatively (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Voice acoustic analysis and ECG can evaluate the operative effect of laryngeal polypectomy objectively and quantitatively.
出处 《武汉大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2008年第5期660-662,共3页 Medical Journal of Wuhan University
关键词 声带息肉 嗓音声学分析 电声门图 Vocal Cord Polyp Voice Acoustic Analysis Electroglottography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

  • 1De Bodt M, Wuyts F, Van de Heyning P, et al. Test - retest study of the GRBAS scale : influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality[J]. J Voice, 1997, 11: 74.
  • 2Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, De Moor GM, et al. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia : Reliability and relevance[J]. Folia Phoniatrica, 1993,45: 76.
  • 3Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia[J]. J Voice,1999, 13: 508.
  • 4Wolfe V, Fitch J, Martin D. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 1997, 49:292.
  • 5Piccirillo J, Colin P, Dennis F. Assessment of two objective voice function indices[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1998, 107: 396.
  • 6Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index : an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approch[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 2000, 43: 796.
  • 7Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1991, 33: 298.
  • 8Yu P, Ouaknine M, Giovanni A. Intérêt clinique du calcul des coefficients de Lyapunov pour l' analyse objective des dysphonies[J]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000, 5: 301.
  • 9Hirano M. Psycho - acoustic evaluation of voice : GRBAS Scale for evaluating the hoarse voice. Clinical examination of voice[J]. Springer Verlag, Wien, 1981.
  • 10Giovanni A, Ouaknine M, Guelfucci B, et al. Non - linear behavior of vocal fold vibration : the role of coupling between the vocal folds[J]. J Voice, 1999, 13: 456.

共引文献99

同被引文献94

引证文献9

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部