期刊文献+

高职护生自我评价能力的调查研究 被引量:1

Investigation on ability of self-assessment in higher vocational nursing students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高职护生自我评价的正确性。方法选择我校2004—2006级高职护生117名,调查护生对外科护理学习成绩的自我评价,并与教师评价进行比较。结果笔试与总的操作考试的自我评价均高于实际得分,r值分别为0.665和0.405。3次操作考试学生自我评价均高于实际得分,r值分别为0.346、0.460和0.462。结论高职护生自我评价的正确性并不高,学生自我评价能力有限。笔试的自评与实际得分的相关系数明显高于操作考试,高职护生更善于正确地评价自己认知性知识的掌握程度。学生自评并与教师评价结果比较可以提高护生自我评价的正确性,有助于学生能正确认识自己,更好地为走上社会打下基础。 Objective To explore the validity of higher vocational nursing students' self-assessment. Methods One hundred and seventeen second-year nursing students' self-assessment of their surgical nursing grades were investigated and a comparison was made between the students assessment and that of their tutor. Results The self-assessments of cognitive-based and performance-based examinations were both higher than the actual point. The correlations between self-assessment and actual point were 0. 665 and 0.405, respectively. The students' self-assessments of performance-based practical examinations were also higher than the actual point. The correlation was 0.3460, 0.460 and 0.462. Conclusion The validity of higher vocational nursing students' self-assessment was not high enough, which indicated that their ability of self-assessment was quite limited. The higher correlation between students' self-assessment and actual point in cognitive-based examination showed that these nursing students were good at assessing their mastery of cognitive-based knowledge. It also suggested that comparison between students' self-assessment and tutor assessment could improve the validity of students' self-assessment even the improvement was limited.
出处 《上海护理》 2008年第5期24-27,共4页 Shanghai Nursing
关键词 高职护生 自我评价 教师评价 Higher vocational nursing students Serf-assessment Tutor assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Ward M,Gruppen L,Regehr G.Measuring self-assessment:Current state of the art[J].Adv Health Sci Edue Theory Pract,2002,7(1):63-80.
  • 2吕留萍.学生自我评价方法在教学实践中的应用[J].教学月刊(中学版)(教学参考),2006(1):25-27. 被引量:7
  • 3[3]Doehy F,Moerkerke G.The present,the past and the future of achievement testing and performance assessment[J].Int J Edu Res,1997,27(5):415-432.
  • 4[4]Mattiasson AC,Andersson L.Quality of nursing home care assessed by competent nursing home patients[J].J Adv Nurs,1997,26(6):1117-1124.
  • 5[5]Chambers MA.Some issues in the assessment of clinical practice:A review of the literature[J].J Clin Nurs,1998,7(3):201-208.
  • 6[6]Gordon MJ.A review of the validity and accuracy of selfassessments in health professions training[J].Acad Med,1991,66(12):762-769.
  • 7李静,孙宏玉,王静,郑修霞.护生临床能力教评和自评的差异性比较[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(5):48-50. 被引量:29
  • 8张洪潭.体育教学概念匡补[J].上海体育学院学报,1994,18(3):1-6. 被引量:37
  • 9[9]Fitzgerad JT,Gruppen LD,White CB.The influence of task formats on the accuracy of medical students'self-as-sessments[J].Acad Med,2000,75(7):737-741.
  • 10慈航.论高职大学生自我意识的完善[J].大学时代(B版),2006(11):63-65. 被引量:11

二级参考文献18

共引文献80

同被引文献14

  • 1王丽娟.实习护生应对教学查房利用信息资源情况的调查[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2005,11(5):419-420. 被引量:3
  • 2McWilliam P,Botwinski C. Developing a successful nursing objec- tive structured clinical examination [J]. The Journal of Nursing Education,2010,49(1) :36 - 41.
  • 3Koh LC. Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre- registration nurse education [J]. Nurse Education in Practice, 2008,8(4) =223- 230.
  • 4Davidson JE. Preceptor use of classroom assessment techniques to stimulate higher - order thinking in the clinical setting [J]. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,2009,40(3) =139 - 143.
  • 5Nielsen C,Sommer I,Larsen K,et al. Model of practical skill per- formance as an instrument for supervision and formative assess ment[J]. Nurse Education in Practice,2012,13(3) =176 - 180.
  • 6Rolfe I, McPherson J. Formative assessment: How am I doing? [J]. The Lancet, 1995,345(8953) :837 - 839.
  • 7Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Reflection : A link between receiving and using assessment feedback [J]. Ad- vances in Health Sciences Education,2009,14(3) :399 -410.
  • 8Cotter VT, Bradway CK, Cross D, et al. Clinical evaluation tools for dual track adult and gerontology nurse practitioner students [J]. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2009,21(12) :658 - 662.
  • 9Myrick F, Yonge O. Preceptor behaviors integral to the promo- tion of student critical thinking[J]. Journal for Nurses in Profes- sional Development, 2002,18(3) : 127 - 133.
  • 10胡艳琼,陈先华.护理教育中形成性评价的研究现状与展望[J].护理学杂志,2010,25(19):95-97. 被引量:48

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部