摘要
"字"本位持论者志于确定汉语运行的基础,认为"字"是汉语中最基本的音义结合的理据块。理据持论者则志于探究语言符号发生发展的动因,以"字"为探索语言理据的最基本的出发点。本文从学术背景、相互关系、基本单位、语言共性和研究目标五个方面对理据论与"字"本位论进行比较分析,认为二者具有深层次的联系;就是说,虽然研究角度与方法有所不同,但是它们都把历时与共时、语义与语法和谐相系,共同为挖掘汉语的本质特点、解读语言的奥秘开创了新的领域。理据论与"字"本位论貌离而神合,异曲而同工。
The Theory of Zi aims to discover the operational mechanism of the Chinese language on the basis of Zi which is the motivated basic unit. The Theory of Linguistic Motivation investigates the driving force that motivates the emergence and evolution of linguistic signs and it claims that Zi is the starting point of this study. This paper makes a comparative study of them from five perspectives and it is concluded that though they differ from each other in their research orientation and methodology, the two theories are exploring a new paradigm to discover the defining features of Chinese and that of language at large.
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2008年第4期77-83,共7页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(项目编号:08SJB7400008)
关键词
理据论
“字”本位论
关系
比较
the theory of linguistic motivation
the theory of Zi
relation
comparison
