期刊文献+

理据论与“字”本位论关系初探 被引量:1

A Study on the Relation between the Theory of Linguistic Motivation and that of "Zi"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "字"本位持论者志于确定汉语运行的基础,认为"字"是汉语中最基本的音义结合的理据块。理据持论者则志于探究语言符号发生发展的动因,以"字"为探索语言理据的最基本的出发点。本文从学术背景、相互关系、基本单位、语言共性和研究目标五个方面对理据论与"字"本位论进行比较分析,认为二者具有深层次的联系;就是说,虽然研究角度与方法有所不同,但是它们都把历时与共时、语义与语法和谐相系,共同为挖掘汉语的本质特点、解读语言的奥秘开创了新的领域。理据论与"字"本位论貌离而神合,异曲而同工。 The Theory of Zi aims to discover the operational mechanism of the Chinese language on the basis of Zi which is the motivated basic unit. The Theory of Linguistic Motivation investigates the driving force that motivates the emergence and evolution of linguistic signs and it claims that Zi is the starting point of this study. This paper makes a comparative study of them from five perspectives and it is concluded that though they differ from each other in their research orientation and methodology, the two theories are exploring a new paradigm to discover the defining features of Chinese and that of language at large.
作者 李二占
出处 《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第4期77-83,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(项目编号:08SJB7400008)
关键词 理据论 “字”本位论 关系 比较 the theory of linguistic motivation the theory of Zi relation comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1潘文国.语言的定义[J].华东师范大学学报,2001,(1).
  • 2林汉达.1949.中国语文的整理和发展.倪海曙编.《中国语文的新生》.时代书报出版社.
  • 3吕叔湘.1986.中国语法学史稿·序.龚千炎.《中国语法学史稿》.语文出版社,1987.
  • 4潘文国.语言研究与语言教学[J].语言文字应用,1997,(1998).
  • 5严复.1904.英文汉诂·叙.王杭主编.《严复集》第一集.中华书局,1986.
  • 6Derrida, Jacques 1967 De la Grammotologie. Translated into English by G. Spivak as Of Gram motology, Baltomore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1976.
  • 7Harris, Roy 2000 Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.
  • 8Saussure, F. de 1916 Cours de linguistique generale. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, Paris: Payor & Cie, 1972. Translated into English by R. Harris as Course in General Linguistics, La salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co. 1986.

共引文献35

同被引文献20

  • 1屠友祥.索绪尔“符号学”设想的缘起和意图[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(5):34-42. 被引量:31
  • 2姚振武.“认知语言学”思考[J].语文研究,2007(2):13-24. 被引量:19
  • 3姚小平.索绪尔《普通语言学教程》中的langue、langage、parole[M]//李宇明,等.言语与言语学研究.武汉:崇文书局,2005:63-78.
  • 4[美]乔纳森·卡勒.索绪尔[M].宋珉译,北京:昆仑出版社,1999:14-25;111.
  • 5Newmeyer,F.J.Language Form and Language Function[M].Cambridge/Massachusetts:The MIT Press,1998:114.
  • 6Bouissac,P.Syntactic Iconicity and Connectionist Models of Language and Cognition[M]//Landsberg,M.E.(Ed.).Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes.Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,1995:393-417.
  • 7Dressler,W.U.Interactions between Iconicity and Other Semiotic Parameters in Language[M]//Simone,R.(Ed.).Iconicity in Language.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,1994:21 -37.
  • 8[瑞士]费尔迪南·德·索绪尔.普通语言学教程[M].裴文译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2001:148-149.
  • 9Thibault,P.J.Rereading Saussure:The Dynamics of Signs in Social Li fe[M].London:Routledge,1997:292.
  • 10Saussure,F.de.Course in General Linguistics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001:35-36; 67-68; 89.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部