期刊文献+

基于结构化模型的违约概率期限结构研究 被引量:1

Study on term structure of default probability based on structural models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究国内信贷市场上违约概率的期限结构问题.首先,基于结构化模型基本原理,提出了累积违约概率和边际违约概率模型;然后,利用国内某银行的数据,测算了1~20年期边际违约概率曲线以及年度累积违约概率和年度边际违约概率;最后,通过情景分析的方法研究了波动率σ和违约阈值 B 对违约概率期限结构的影响.研究发现:1)在1年期违约概率的预测方面,结构化模型优于 Z′评分模型;2)违约概率的变化幅度随期限的增加而逐渐降低.但对于风险较高的贷款,5年期以上的年度边际违约概率的变化幅度不应被忽略,需要对目前的信用风险度量和定价方式加以改进;3)风险越高,近期违约概率越大,中远期违约概率先增后减;时点距离当前越远,边际违约概率对这些风险因素的敏感性越低. This paper studies the term structure problem of default probability (PD) in China' s local debt market. Firstly, models of cumulative PD and marginal PD were put forward by following the basic rules of structural models ; Then, using local banks' data, the 1 - 20 year marginal PD curves and 1 -20 cumulative PD and the yearly marginal PD were calculated; Finally, the effects of volatility or and default threshold B on PD were studied through scene analysis. It is found that: l ) the structural models' prediction power on one-year' s PD is better than Z' score models; 2) the longer the term is, the less the change scope of PD is. However, the change scope of high-risk debts whose term is more than the 5-years should not be ignored. So, the current method of debt pricing for more than 5-year debt should be improved; 3) the higher the risk is, and the bigger the short- term PD is, both the medium-term and the long-term PD increase firstly and then decrease; the longer the term is, the less the sensitivity of PD to those risk factors is.
作者 郝成 程功
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期503-507,共5页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20060056013)
关键词 结构化模型 信用风险 期限结构 structural models credit risk term structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1巴塞尔银行监管委员会.统一资本计量和资本标准的国际协议:修订框架[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2004.
  • 2Black F, Cox J. Valuing corporate securities : Some effects of bond indenture provisions [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1976, 31 (2) : 351-367.
  • 3Crouhy M, Galai D, Mark R. A comparative analysis of current credit risk models[J]. Journal of Finance, 2000, 24( 1): 59-117.
  • 4Darrell D, Singleton K. Modeling term structure of defauhable bonds [ J ]. Review of Financial Studies, 1999, 12 (4) : 687-720.
  • 5Darrell D, Lando D. Term structure of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information[J]. Econometrica, 2001, 69 (3): 633-664.
  • 6Harrison J M. Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems [ M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
  • 7Ericsson J, Reneby J. Estimating structural bond pricing models [ J ]. Journal of Business, 2005, 78 (2) : 707-735.
  • 8Leland H, Toft K B. Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spread [ J]. Journal of Finance, 1996, 51(3) : 987-1019.
  • 9Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates[J]. Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2) : 449-470.
  • 10李玉霜,张维.分类树应用于商业银行贷款5分类的探讨[J].系统工程学报,2001,16(4):282-288. 被引量:15

二级参考文献18

  • 1石晓军,陈殿左.债权结构、波动率与信用风险——对中国上市公司的实证研究[J].财经研究,2004,30(9):24-32. 被引量:36
  • 2Li Yushuang,Conference Proceedings of Canada China University Partnership Program,1998年,218页
  • 3Altmen E,J Banking Finance,1985年,11卷,2期,269页
  • 4Jarrow R, Turnbull S. Derivative Securities[M]. South-Western College Publishing,1995.
  • 5Huang, Jingzhi, Ming Huang. How much of the corporate-treasury yield spread is due to credit risk? Results from a new calibration approach [R]. Working paper, GSB, Stanford University,2002.
  • 6Vassalou M, Xing Y H. Default risk in equity returns [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(2): 831 - 868.
  • 7考爱特 爱特曼 纳若亚南 石晓军 张振霞 译.演进着的信用风险管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 8Alrman E I. Financial patios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy[ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1968,23(4): 589 - 609.
  • 9Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates[ J]. Journal of Finance, 1974,29:449 - 470.
  • 10Kealhofer S, Kurbat M. The default prediction power of merton approach, relative to debt ratings and accounting variables [ R ].KMV Corporation, 2001.

共引文献119

同被引文献18

  • 1Bharath D T, Shumway T. Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model[J]. Review of Financial, 2008, 21(3): 1339-1369.
  • 2Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt:The risk structure of interest rates[J]. Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2): 449-470.
  • 3Leland H E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252.
  • 4Leland H E, Tort K B. Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1996, 51(3): 987-1019.
  • 5Pierre M B, William P. Strategic debt service[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2): 531-556.
  • 6Kealhofer S, Kurbat M. Benchmarking Quantitative Default Risk Models: Avalidation Methodology[R]. San Francisco: Moody's KMV, 2000.
  • 7Duffle D, Wang K. Multi-period Corporate Failure Prediction Withstochastic Covariates[D]. Palo Alto: Stanford University, 2004.
  • 8王瑞铭.利用分量回归法探讨KMV信用风险模型:违约点定义之检讨[D].高雄:国立中山大学,2008.
  • 9Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
  • 10Basili M. Knightian uncertainty in financial markets: An assessment[J]. Eecnomic Notes, 2001, 30(1): 1-26.

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部