期刊文献+

意见收敛定理与休谟问题 被引量:4

The Theorem of Convergence of Opinions and Hume's Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意见收敛定理是主观主义概率论的一条重要定理,它表明随着证据的增加,验前概率的主观性将被验后概率的客观性所代替。意见收敛定理被看作主观概率的动态合理性原则,因而被用来解决休谟问题,即归纳合理性问题。然而,哈金有说服力地表明,意见收敛定理证明的是条件概率Pr(h/e)的收敛,而不是验后概率Pre(h)的收敛。主观主义概率论暗中接受的一个等式是:Pre(h)=Pr(h/e),通常称之为"条件化规则"。这样,归纳法的合理性问题变成条件化规则的合理性问题。为此,本文提出一个新的合理性原则,即"最少初始概率原则",将它同"局部合理性"观念结合起来便可为条件化规则的合理性加以辩护。 The theorem of convergence of opinions is an important theorem in the subjective theory of probability. It demonstrates that the subjectivity of a prior probability will be substituted with the objectivity of a posterior probability as evidences increase. The theorem of convergence of opinions is regarded as the dynamic principle of rationality concerning the subjective probability, and therefore is used to resolve Hume's problem, i. e. , the problem of inductive rationality. However, Hacking convincingly argues that the theorem of convergence of opinions is not about the convergence of a posterior probability Pre(h), but about the convergence of a conditional probability Pr(h/e). The subjective theory of probability implies a tacit acceptance of an equation that is Pre(h) = Pr( h/ e), usually called "the rule of conditionalisation". Thus, the problem of rationality of induction is converted into one concerning the rule of conditionalisation. In this paper a new principle of rationality (the principle of minimum number of initial probabilities) is put forward, which, in combination with the concept of "local rationality", offers a justification for the rule of conditionalisation.
作者 陈晓平
出处 《现代哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期67-74,共8页 Modern Philosophy
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目资助 项目编号为:05JZD0008
关键词 意见收敛定理 主观主义概率论 休谟问题 条件化规则 the theorem of convergence of opinions subjective theory of probability Hume' sproblem the rule of conditionalisation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1B. De Finetti, 'Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources' (1937), English translation in H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, 1964, 93 - 158.
  • 2D. Gillise, Philosophical Theories of Probability, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 72.
  • 3I. Hacking, ' Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability', Philosophy of Science, vol. 34 (1967), pp. 311 - 325.
  • 4P. Teller, ' Conditionalisation and Observation' , Syntheses, vol. 26 (1973) pp. 218 -258
  • 5C. Howson, Hume's Problem : Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2000)
  • 6陈晓平.关于“酒-水悖论”的分析与解决[J].自然辩证法研究,2007,23(6):20-23. 被引量:4
  • 7陈晓平.无差别原则与贝叶斯疑难[J].哲学研究,2007(7):106-111. 被引量:4
  • 8M.Hesse.见其著作The Structure of Scientivid Inference, 1974, pp. 115 - 118.
  • 9《归纳逻辑与归纳悖论》(武汉大学出版社,1994年)

二级参考文献8

  • 1Bayes, T. & Price, R. , 1970 ( 1763 ), "An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances", reprinted in E. S. Pearson and M. G. Kendall( eds. ), Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, Griffin.
  • 2Edwards, A. W. F. , 1978, "Commentary on the arguments of Thomas Bayes", in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 5.
  • 3Gillise, D. , 2000, Philosophical Theories of Probability, London: Routledge.
  • 4Keynes, J. M. , 1963 (1921) , A Treatise on Probability, Macmillan.
  • 5Laplace, P. S. , 1951 (1814), A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, English translation of the 6th French edition, Dover.
  • 6Laplace P S.(1814) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities[M].English Translation of the 6th French Edition,Dover,1951.
  • 7Keynes J M.(1921) A Treatise on Probability[M].Macmillan,1963.42,60.
  • 8Gillise D.Philosophical Theories of Probability[M].London:Routledge,2000.41-42.

共引文献5

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部