期刊文献+

中日欧美抗震规范结构影响系数的构成及其对塑性变形需求的影响 被引量:15

Composition of Structural Behavior Factors in Codes of China,Japan,Europe and USA for Earthquake-Resistance and Their Corresponding Ductility Demands
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对中、日、欧州及美国地震规范地震力计算的结构影响系数的构成进行了分析,认为,美国的结构影响系数中包括了材料的强屈比、超静定结构体系的超强系数以及延性系数;而欧洲的结构影响系数包含了延性系数,对于延性好的结构还允许包含结构体系的超强系数;日本仅包含延性系数;我国也是仅包含延性系数。由于日本采用允许应力设计,还有一个1.4的安全系数,因此比较起来,日本的地震力最大。从结构影响系数的构成看结构在地震作用下产生塑性变形的深度,按照美国规范设计的结构塑性变形要求最高,欧洲次之,我国再次之,按照日本规范设计的结构塑性变形要求最小。 The composition of structural performance factors for base shear determination in the codes of China, Japan, Europe and USA for earthquake resistance are discussed. In USA, it includes overstrength factors of both the material and the structural system and the ductility, in EC8 it contains the ductility factor,and the structural overstrength factor in structural system with high ductility. In Japan and China, it reflects only the ductility. Because in Japan a load factor of 1.4 is introduced, it has the biggest earthquake forces for structural design. Based on the composition of the structural behavior factors, it can be deduced that the USA code puts the most severe demand on the plastic deformation capacity of structural members against earthquakes, Eurocode 8 lies on the second, and the Chinese code is on the third. The Japan code may have the least demand on the ductility although it contains similar requirements on detailing of members and joints.
出处 《建筑钢结构进展》 2008年第5期53-62,共10页 Progress in Steel Building Structures
关键词 结构影响系数 延性 抗震设计 structural behavior factor ductility seismic design
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]European Committee for Standardization.Eurocode 8:Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S].Brussels:CEN,2003.
  • 2[3]International Code Council.International Building Code 2006[S].California:International Conference of Building Officials,1997.
  • 3[4]American Society of Civil Engineers,ASCE7-05:Minimum design loads for building and other structures,2006.
  • 4[5]Building Seismic Safety Council.FEMA450 (NEHRP),Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures Part1:Provisions[S].Washington,D.C.:Building seismic safety council,National institute of building sciences,2003.
  • 5[8]日本建筑学会.钢构造限界状态设计指针同解说(Recommendation for Limit State Design of Steel Structures)[M].SI单位版,2002年9月.
  • 6[10]Whittaker A.,Hart G.,Rojahn C..Seismic Response Modification Factors[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,1999,125(4):438-444.
  • 7[11]Miranda E..Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.
  • 8[12]Tong Gen-shu,Huang Jin-qiao.Seismic Force Modification Factor for Ductile Structures[J] Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE,2005,16 A(8):813-825.
  • 9赵永峰,童根树.修正Clough滞回模型下的地震力调整系数[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(10):34-41. 被引量:12
  • 10童根树,赵永峰.动力P-Δ效应对地震力调整系数的影响[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(1):120-125. 被引量:17

二级参考文献33

  • 1.GB50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001..
  • 2Tong G S,Huang J Q.Seismic force modification factors for structures[J].Journal of Zhejiang University science,2005,6A (8):813-825
  • 3中国工程建设标准化协会.CECS160-2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2004
  • 4International Code Council.Uniform Building Code 1997[S].California:International Conference of Building Officials,1997
  • 5European committee for standardization.Eurcode 8:Design of structures for earthquake resistance[S].Brussels:CEN,2003
  • 6Miranda E.Site-dependent strength-reduction factors[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119:3503-3519
  • 7Vidic T,Fajfar P.Consistent inelastic design spectra:strength and displacement[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1994,23:507-521
  • 8Borzi B,Elnashai A S.Refined force reduction factors for seismic design[J].Engineering Structures,2000,22:1244-1260
  • 9Miranda E,Jorge RG.Influence of stiffness degradation on strength demands of structures built on soft soil sites[J].Engineering Structures,2002,24:1271-1281
  • 10Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of California. SEAOC blue book, Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary [S]. Sacramento, California: SEAOC, 1996.

共引文献30

同被引文献137

引证文献15

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部